"The fuel, hydrogen peroxide..."
H2O2, solus, is a low-Isp non-starter for any future development, and even as an oxidizer with a proper fuel in a bipropellant system. They're going to have either short range or rather oversized propellant tanks --> more mass, more drag, less payload. If missiles (or any other airframes) are going to be propelled by rocketry, the high-efficiency future will be in the direction of SpaceX' high-pressure-regime methalox engines, shrunk to scale. They already operate at detonation pressures, and a thermodynamic efficiency approaching theoretical limits.
I suspect their use of peroxide is for its resistance to RDEs' notorious flameout instabilities. It's like a trick-candle that starts itself up again after you blow it out.
RDEs waste space and increase mass, filling the core with metal just for the purpose of presenting a thin annulus to sustain the revolving shock front(s). That's volume that a conventional rocket engine chamber exploits to the max to get the greatest throughput (via the injector-populated back wall) for mass ejection and velocity out the freaking nozzle.