Why Didn't the Allies Bomb Auschwitz?

Jan 20, 2020
1
0
0
The Americans and the British did high altitude bombing. Not very accurate. It's doubtful if it would have accomplished anything. However, the Soviets were approximately 100 miles away during the last 6 months of Aushwitz's operations. The Soviets had Illushin Stormovik ground attack planes. They could have easily stopped operations at Aushwitz with minimal collateral damage to the prisoners.
 
Jan 20, 2020
1
0
0
The Americans and the British did high altitude bombing. Not very accurate. It's doubtful if it would have accomplished anything.
ALL bombing in WWII was inaccurate.

That's one of the major premises of the the article.

Go back and find the sentence which mentioned how many bombs required to achieve 90% chance of success.

Moreover every platform had its limitations... the 15th Air Force at the time was elsewhere in Europe trying to take out the ability for the Nazis to re-supply their war machine.

Medium and low altitude bombing missions required too much of an escort at the time to make bombing Auschwitz a viable target from a purely a strategic perspective.

What the allies could have done, is say, bomb the train tracks into the camps. But, as the article also mentions there was no political appetite to do so because of Antisemitism back home. You should go back and read that part again too.

Illushin Stormovik ground attack planes. They could have easily stopped operations at Aushwitz (sic) with minimal collateral damage to the prisoners.
Completely RIDICULOUS statement. The Il-2 was a close support aircraft NOT a bomber.

It only carried anti-tank and crude cluster bombs. That's NOT going to bring Auschwitz down. It would set it on fire but that's about it.

The IL-2 was considered an inaccurate platform -- even by WWII standards. The only reason it got any notoriety is because how many of them were produced... NOT that it was a capable platform.
 
Dec 26, 2019
218
50
130
Or maybe Prescott Bush shouldn't have helped to fund Hitler in the first place and or the bankers. Does Rothschild ring a bell? And what about IBM? Take a look at what they did for Hitler.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Noeh209
Jan 21, 2020
1
1
5
Or maybe Prescott Bush shouldn't have helped to fund Hitler in the first place and or the bankers. Does Rothschild ring a bell? And what about IBM? Take a look at what they did for Hitler.

Finally someone that actually knows they true history and not the fake history that was taught in school. You beat me to the punch wifi lagging so registering for a account took me a bit. Great grand pappy bush and his fellow german/u.k. cabal friend came up with the perfect master plan to get rich by purposely sparking a second world war business was booming and they built they empire. So of course bombing wasn't accurate 🤔 I wonder why. follow the money oh that's right conspiracy theories are acts of terrorism now and will not be tolerated foreign or domestic (with us or against us) 🤣 they will not negociate either just fly they family out of the US for they safety because of the last name
Bushes and Binladens sitting in a tree laughing and bullshiting cause they had planned on paying for 2 wars and only had to pay for 1 cause the other was free.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Truthseeker007
Dec 26, 2019
218
50
130
Finally someone that actually knows they true history and not the fake history that was taught in school. You beat me to the punch wifi lagging so registering for a account took me a bit. Great grand pappy bush and his fellow german/u.k. cabal friend came up with the perfect master plan to get rich by purposely sparking a second world war business was booming and they built they empire. So of course bombing wasn't accurate 🤔 I wonder why. follow the money oh that's right conspiracy theories are acts of terrorism now and will not be tolerated foreign or domestic (with us or against us) 🤣 they will not negociate either just fly they family out of the US for they safety because of the last name
Bushes and Binladens sitting in a tree laughing and bullshiting cause they had planned on paying for 2 wars and only had to pay for 1 cause the other was free.
Thanks! They definitely won't teach it in school that is for sure. I am glad there is also someone else here that don't think I am crazy for pointing it out.lol! Speaking of the Bush's and Binladens. Do you remember right after 911 the Binladens that were here in the US were conveniently flown out of the US. Not to mention Osama Bin Laden was trained in the US and was a CIA asset and used as the boogie man for years. But yea the Bush family has involved with the war machine for a long time not to mention you know who was in charge of the CIA in the 80s. No other then daddy Bush. I would be willing to bet the Bush's were somehow connected to the JFK assassination. But yea there is a lot to be learned more about what really happened in Germany with the NAZI's and Hitler. And I am sure it isn't what we are taught in places they call schools in the US.
 
Jan 21, 2020
3
0
10
Finally someone that actually knows they true history and not the fake history that was taught in school. You beat me to the punch wifi lagging so registering for a account took me a bit. Great grand pappy bush and his fellow german/u.k. cabal friend came up with the perfect master plan to get rich by purposely sparking a second world war business was booming and they built they empire. So of course bombing wasn't accurate 🤔 I wonder why. follow the money oh that's right conspiracy theories are acts of terrorism now and will not be tolerated foreign or domestic (with us or against us) 🤣 they will not negociate either just fly they family out of the US for they safety because of the last name
Bushes and Binladens sitting in a tree laughing and bullshiting cause they had planned on paying for 2 wars and only had to pay for 1 cause the other was free.
Funny how you two completely forget good ol’ Joe Kennedy! Wrong party eh?
 
Dec 7, 2019
18
4
35
One of the most central reasons for nixing the plan to bomb Auschwitz was that it was a one-way mission, the bombers would not carry enough fuel to turn around afterwards and return to any Allied base. They would have to land in nearby Soviet territory, and Stalin refused to give permission for it. That was the end of discussions at high levels in the American military and by Roosevelt. The idea of bombing the trains would do nothing to stop the slaughter, as the Nazis would simply revert to machine-gun executions rather than poison gas. PBS is a notably Left-wing outfit, and so it would not surprise me if they did not include that fact, about Soviet refusals. And as another commenter stated, the Soviets had their own excellent short-range bombers that could have bombed the crematoria with greater accuracy and more easily. Neither are mentioned in the article, however, so I assume it isn't in the PBS video. There is a tendency underway by modern film-makers, almost all of whom are Leftist scribblers, falsifying 20th Century history. Especially the PBS outfit in WGBH (Boston?) has a series of toxic lying "documentaries" about American history.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Truthseeker007
Dec 26, 2019
218
50
130
One of the most central reasons for nixing the plan to bomb Auschwitz was that it was a one-way mission, the bombers would not carry enough fuel to turn around afterwards and return to any Allied base. They would have to land in nearby Soviet territory, and Stalin refused to give permission for it. That was the end of discussions at high levels in the American military and by Roosevelt. The idea of bombing the trains would do nothing to stop the slaughter, as the Nazis would simply revert to machine-gun executions rather than poison gas. PBS is a notably Left-wing outfit, and so it would not surprise me if they did not include that fact, about Soviet refusals. And as another commenter stated, the Soviets had their own excellent short-range bombers that could have bombed the crematoria with greater accuracy and more easily. Neither are mentioned in the article, however, so I assume it isn't in the PBS video. There is a tendency underway by modern film-makers, almost all of whom are Leftist scribblers, falsifying 20th Century history. Especially the PBS outfit in WGBH (Boston?) has a series of toxic lying "documentaries" about American history.
Yea lots of propaganda to sift through that is for sure. I do think you made some good points on that.
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY

Latest posts