Interesting stuff, but what if spacetime is itself a web, that has naturally occurring fluctuations of density and where spacetime is already denser is where matter accumulates?
Yup a mind boggler. Considering also in 1952 Einstein wrote, “Physical objects are not in space, but these objects are spatially extended. In this way the concept ‘empty space’ loses its meaning.”Mind boggling!
Sorry, but dark matter has nothing to do with black holes or dark energy. Dark matter is called "dark" because it does not seem to feel any force except gravity. So, it does not by definition interact with electromagnetic energy, meaning that it can't clump up or slow down, which would be necessary to bond in any way with ordinary matter or to form a black hole (which is collapsed ordinary matter). Instead, it just orbits in diffuse clouds around massive objects like galaxies or star clusters withour ever settling down. And dark energy is a force which has nothing to do with either black holes or dark matter, since it seems to pervade the universe uniformly, causing it to expand uniformly at all points. Since it is very weak, it is only measured over very large distances. This is all very well established physics.A well written summary for the definition of space-time. I like the history and the introduction of how space-time works, but the focus on a reconciled quantum mechanical model to explain gravity seems like a math problem. A more logical approach might be to consider the 'Big Bang' theory from a pre-existing fabric of space-time without any real matter, as a proposed one dimensional determinant, its inception starts with the unfolding perspective of this dimensional determinant for space-time fabric towards existence. The sequence is somewhat understood from an expansion from our one dimensional space-time into a two dimensional space-time fabric, and then into a three dimensional space-time fabric, and so on. The expectation is that ordinary matter creation took place within a pre-existing dark energy medium of space-time. Indeed, the existence of matter would be an intrusion upon this pre-existing universal medium of space-time which maintains a zero sum difference that is the balance of our cosmological continuum.
With this understanding, any perturbation in this medium would engender a warping of this pre-ordered dark energy template of space-time fabric in the evolutionary perspective of its dimensional unfolding. Wherein the creation of matter as a whole induces a complementary displacement, or warping, in the dark energy medium of the space-time fabric, its promulgation is interdependent on its insistence and persistence. For within this warping, there is yet another pertubation in the whole matter created; a dual relationship of newly created positive density matter in an envelopment of negative density matter. The complementary displacement insulates the newly created positive density matter in an envelopment of negative density matter. This envelope of negative density matter, known as dark matter, then infiltrates the spaces in matter, providing it with the ability to interact, bond, and evolve. Indeed it would require much more dark matter to fill the spaces among ordinary matter down to its smallest constituent parts.
So if dark matter is what engenders a force of gravity for ordinary matter to bond, then the accretion and accumulation of ordinary matter is just the resultant consequence of this force. And if the black holes are nothing but dark matter, then it would also follow that dark matter can be accumulated, separate of ordinary matter. It would therefore also follow that the gravitational force is more representative of negative density mass than positive density mass.
Upon this hypothesis then, one can expect that there is a require transition to separate ordinary matter from its complementary dark matter. It starts first with the disintegration of matter, as a whole, as it interacts with the event horizon of the black hole. As the positive density mass is 'squeezed' upon its own gravitational acceleration toward the black hole, liken to the spaghettification effect, its matter changes to allow for its disintegration via transmutation and the massive release of photons due to alpha decay and beta decay. This is the effect wherein positive density mass is collected within the event horizon, into a plasma, increasing its photon density. This 'squeezing' effect is like extracting out the dark matter from the whole matter, allowing for the ordinary matter to be reduced to its smallest constituent components. The dark matter is then absorbed into the black hole, and the remnants of ordinary matter are discarded and radiated out at high velocity back into the cosmos; to start, once again, to reintegrated into the universe via bonding and evolving.
If you're interested in exploring this concept more, please review the alternative theories presented in the book, 'The Evolutioning of Creation: Volume 2', or even the ramifications of these concepts in the sci-fi fantasy adventure, 'Shadow-Forge Revelations'. The theoretical presentation brings forth a variety of alternative perspectives on the aspects of existence that form our reality.
Actually there is nothing about black holes or dark matter that is well established. They both remain as subjects of theoretical physics which is in constant variation due to competing theories. So it is really a thought provoking playground and the subject of much discussion. As for your belief that dark energy is a force which has nothing to do with either black holes or dark matter, you still need to consider how they interact to refute my perspective.Sorry, but dark matter has nothing to do with black holes or dark energy. Dark matter is called "dark" because it does not seem to feel any force except gravity. So, it does not by definition interact with electromagnetic energy, meaning that it can't clump up or slow down, which would be necessary to bond in any way with ordinary matter or to form a black hole (which is collapsed ordinary matter). Instead, it just orbits in diffuse clouds around massive objects like galaxies or star clusters withour ever settling down. And dark energy is a force which has nothing to do with either black holes or dark matter, since it seems to pervade the universe uniformly, causing it to expand uniformly at all points. Since it is very weak, it is only measured over very large distances. This is all very well established physics.
Actually there is nothing about black holes or dark matter that is well established. They both remain as subjects of theoretical physics which is in constant variation due to competing theories. So it is really a thought provoking playground and the subject of much discussion. As for your belief that dark energy is a force which has nothing to do with either black holes or dark matter, you still need to consider how they interact to refute my perspective.
True, all these cosmogonist theories are indeed somewhat like fairy tales [also known as hypotheses] because they are only an nth degree projection of thought manipulation, oftimes supported by nothing other than mathematical equations and/or proofs. They the fairy tales for the scientifically minded that would seek to find a rationale for our existence. I always loved a well written fantasy, but it has to make sense to me.These ideas are ignoring some plainly obvious facts of logic that blows these theories to smithereans. This article and scientists are really promoting speculation fairy tales that cannot have any logic to them if one does not ignore some obvious facts that contradict these "far out theories" only found in their imaginations.
For example, the definition of "space" is the absence of anything, ie, nothing. Since space is nothing at all, then space cannot be bent, since one cannot bend nothing. There is nothing to bend.
Also, what is time? It is not some substance that floats around the universe as these super silly and illogical ideas state or suggest. Time is also nothing because all time is is the idea that some event happens after another event. We can measure the amount of "time" that passed by using some constant stream of motion that can create clocks or stopwatches. The fact that something happened after another something does not make time some substance that can be bent. Time is only in our minds and also in the movement of things.
So to say space (nothing) is joined with time (also nothing, only our thoughts of knowing which happened first and how long ago) can be bent should be put in Grimm's fairy tales.
To say the gravity is caused by the bending of nothing and nothing fairy tale is an extra illogical fairy tales which tries to explain the unexplainable, gravity. (The only real explanation if our loving Creator made gravity function.)
Also, the speed of light is not constant as scientists in 2015 showed in experiments. They slowed down light photons (search the web for it).
The theory of relativity also has lots of holes in it just using logic. Although it has lots of truth to it, its relative speed and slowing of the ageing and movement of things for those who travel more at the speed of light is a self contradiction. So how does their body know they are traveling at the speed of light to slow everything down? It does not know at all. Besides all speed is relative, so if a rocket takes off from Earth to a star at the speed of light, they are going the speed of light relative to the Earth and the star. But what if there is a 2nd star behind the one they are going to but the 2nd star is moving the speed of light away from earth in the same direction as the rocket. So the speed of the rocket is ZERO mph, not the speed of light. So how does the body now know which speed to age at since it could pick the speed of light for star 1 , or it could pick Zero speed if the rocket decides to go to star 2. Which one does the body pick to age and move at? And how does the body and rocket know which speed to use?
None of this article makes any sense at all.
Sir, You must explain in one line not the concept of others. To my mind space is created by the matter and after complete annihilation energy was left thus a point mass concept came. As the time lapsed the energy started taking into shape as matter and time begins.A well written summary for the definition of space-time. I like the history and the introduction of how space-time works, but the focus on a reconciled quantum mechanical model to explain gravity seems like a math problem. A more logical approach might be to consider the 'Big Bang' theory from a pre-existing fabric of space-time without any real matter, as a proposed one dimensional determinant, its inception starts with the unfolding perspective of this dimensional determinant for space-time fabric towards existence. The sequence is somewhat understood from an expansion from our one dimensional space-time into a two dimensional space-time fabric, and then into a three dimensional space-time fabric, and so on. The expectation is that ordinary matter creation took place within a pre-existing dark energy medium of space-time. Indeed, the existence of matter would be an intrusion upon this pre-existing universal medium of space-time which maintains a zero sum difference that is the balance of our cosmological continuum.
With this understanding, any perturbation in this medium would engender a warping of this pre-ordered dark energy template of space-time fabric in the evolutionary perspective of its dimensional unfolding. Wherein the creation of matter as a whole induces a complementary displacement, or warping, in the dark energy medium of the space-time fabric, its promulgation is interdependent on its insistence and persistence. For within this warping, there is yet another pertubation in the whole matter created; a dual relationship of newly created positive density matter in an envelopment of negative density matter. The complementary displacement insulates the newly created positive density matter in an envelopment of negative density matter. This envelope of negative density matter, known as dark matter, then infiltrates the spaces in matter, providing it with the ability to interact, bond, and evolve. Indeed it would require much more dark matter to fill the spaces among ordinary matter down to its smallest constituent parts.
So if dark matter is what engenders a force of gravity for ordinary matter to bond, then the accretion and accumulation of ordinary matter is just the resultant consequence of this force. And if the black holes are nothing but dark matter, then it would also follow that dark matter can be accumulated, separate of ordinary matter. It would therefore also follow that the gravitational force is more representative of negative density mass than positive density mass.
Upon this hypothesis then, one can expect that there is a require transition to separate ordinary matter from its complementary dark matter. It starts first with the disintegration of matter, as a whole, as it interacts with the event horizon of the black hole. As the positive density mass is 'squeezed' upon its own gravitational acceleration toward the black hole, liken to the spaghettification effect, its matter changes to allow for its disintegration via transmutation and the massive release of photons due to alpha decay and beta decay. This is the effect wherein positive density mass is collected within the event horizon, into a plasma, increasing its photon density. This 'squeezing' effect is like extracting out the dark matter from the whole matter, allowing for the ordinary matter to be reduced to its smallest constituent components. The dark matter is then absorbed into the black hole, and the remnants of ordinary matter are discarded and radiated out at high velocity back into the cosmos; to start, once again, to reintegrated into the universe via bonding and evolving.
If you're interested in exploring this concept more, please review the alternative theories presented in the book, 'The Evolutioning of Creation: Volume 2', or even the ramifications of these concepts in the sci-fi fantasy adventure, 'Shadow-Forge Revelations'. The theoretical presentation brings forth a variety of alternative perspectives on the aspects of existence that form our reality.
The concept of a pre-existing Space-Time fabric has more to do with the concept of potential for the conjoining of Space and Time. Indeed, in my book, 'The Evolutioning of Creation: Volume 2', I sketched out a multidimensional perspective for creation/origin which did start with the concepts of 'No Time' and 'No Space'. I then went on to combine these concepts to include the concepts of 'All Time' and 'All Space', for they are just as infinite and unfathomable as having none at all. Only by analyzing there interactions by degree [i.e. All Time and No Space versus No Time and All Space] did I realize that there are no real constants; for it is only by the nature of their consistency that an existence was able to form at all.About SJB comment, if formation of space-time was a consequence of the so called BB event - as many scientists consider- , then the "pre-existing fabric" in which it happened could not have a spatial nor a temporal nature. It would rather be a "negative net" - to say so- wth no space-time existance where the appearance of an initial zero D singularity (a point with incipient spatial existance) would eventually have arisen (due perhaps to those "density fluctuations" of the primordial grid suggested by Jimdodds).
The subsecuent "unfolding" of the initial 0D singularity into a 1D (linear) reality and then to a 2D ( plane) one and a 3D (volumetric) universe would imply the nested presence of the time factor in each step to produce a new following dimension, "time" being allways the next non-spatial dimension.
In our familiar 3D spatial reality, time is then the 4th dimension - as it is usually considered- along which "reality" unfolds trough.
I was actually musing about a Time before energy or mass; speculating upon a pre-existing universal medium for a space-time template which maintains a zero sum difference as the balance of our cosmological continuum from wherein the creation of matter as a whole spring forth and induces a complementary displacement, or warping, in the dark energy medium of the space-time fabric. If not for the complementary partnership of ordinary matter with dark matter, the preeminent entification of dark energy would keep ordinary matter from forming at all.Sir, You must explain in one line not the concept of others. To my mind space is created by the matter and after complete annihilation energy was left thus a point mass concept came. As the time lapsed the energy started taking into shape as matter and time begins.
The concept of a pre-existing Space-Time fabric has more to do with the concept of potential for the conjoining of Space and Time. Indeed, in my book, 'The Evolutioning of Creation: Volume 2', I sketched out a multidimensional perspective for creation/origin which did start with the concepts of 'No Time' and 'No Space'. I then went on to combine these concepts to include the concepts of 'All Time' and 'All Space', for they are just as infinite and unfathomable as having none at all. Only by analyzing there interactions by degree [i.e. All Time and No Space versus No Time and All Space] did I realize that there are no real constants; for it is only by the nature of their consistency that an existence was able to form at all.About SJB comment, if formation of space-time was a consequence of the so called BB event - as many scientists consider- , then the "pre-existing fabric" in which it happened could not have a spatial nor a temporal nature. It would rather be a "negative net" - to say so- wth no space-time existance where the appearance of an initial zero D singularity (a point with incipient spatial existance) would eventually have arisen (due perhaps to those "density fluctuations" of the primordial grid suggested by Jimdodds).
The subsecuent "unfolding" of the initial 0D singularity into a 1D (linear) reality and then to a 2D ( plane) one and a 3D (volumetric) universe would imply the nested presence of the time factor in each step to produce a new following dimension, "time" being allways the next non-spatial dimension.
In our familiar 3D spatial reality, time is then the 4th dimension - as it is usually considered- along which "reality" unfolds trough.
Wouldnt it be good if time travel were possibleTime is the 4th dimension of length which is the definition of space.
Well sarajo we are all time traveling right now - at the speed of light -> in the 4D spacetime metric of general relativity time integrates at the speed of light through the 3 spatial dimensions - meaning 4D spacetime event series of 3D experiences.Wouldnt it be good if time travel were possible