What Is Space-Time?

Dec 19, 2019
6
2
35
A well written summary for the definition of space-time. I like the history and the introduction of how space-time works, but the focus on a reconciled quantum mechanical model to explain gravity seems like a math problem. A more logical approach might be to consider the 'Big Bang' theory from a pre-existing fabric of space-time without any real matter, as a proposed one dimensional determinant, its inception starts with the unfolding perspective of this dimensional determinant for space-time fabric towards existence. The sequence is somewhat understood from an expansion from our one dimensional space-time into a two dimensional space-time fabric, and then into a three dimensional space-time fabric, and so on. The expectation is that ordinary matter creation took place within a pre-existing dark energy medium of space-time. Indeed, the existence of matter would be an intrusion upon this pre-existing universal medium of space-time which maintains a zero sum difference that is the balance of our cosmological continuum.
With this understanding, any perturbation in this medium would engender a warping of this pre-ordered dark energy template of space-time fabric in the evolutionary perspective of its dimensional unfolding. Wherein the creation of matter as a whole induces a complementary displacement, or warping, in the dark energy medium of the space-time fabric, its promulgation is interdependent on its insistence and persistence. For within this warping, there is yet another pertubation in the whole matter created; a dual relationship of newly created positive density matter in an envelopment of negative density matter. The complementary displacement insulates the newly created positive density matter in an envelopment of negative density matter. This envelope of negative density matter, known as dark matter, then infiltrates the spaces in matter, providing it with the ability to interact, bond, and evolve. Indeed it would require much more dark matter to fill the spaces among ordinary matter down to its smallest constituent parts.
So if dark matter is what engenders a force of gravity for ordinary matter to bond, then the accretion and accumulation of ordinary matter is just the resultant consequence of this force. And if the black holes are nothing but dark matter, then it would also follow that dark matter can be accumulated, separate of ordinary matter. It would therefore also follow that the gravitational force is more representative of negative density mass than positive density mass.
Upon this hypothesis then, one can expect that there is a require transition to separate ordinary matter from its complementary dark matter. It starts first with the disintegration of matter, as a whole, as it interacts with the event horizon of the black hole. As the positive density mass is 'squeezed' upon its own gravitational acceleration toward the black hole, liken to the spaghettification effect, its matter changes to allow for its disintegration via transmutation and the massive release of photons due to alpha decay and beta decay. This is the effect wherein positive density mass is collected within the event horizon, into a plasma, increasing its photon density. This 'squeezing' effect is like extracting out the dark matter from the whole matter, allowing for the ordinary matter to be reduced to its smallest constituent components. The dark matter is then absorbed into the black hole, and the remnants of ordinary matter are discarded and radiated out at high velocity back into the cosmos; to start, once again, to reintegrated into the universe via bonding and evolving.
If you're interested in exploring this concept more, please review the alternative theories presented in the book, 'The Evolutioning of Creation: Volume 2', or even the ramifications of these concepts in the sci-fi fantasy adventure, 'Shadow-Forge Revelations'. The theoretical presentation brings forth a variety of alternative perspectives on the aspects of existence that form our reality.
 
Dec 21, 2019
1
1
0
Interesting stuff, but what if spacetime is itself a web, that has naturally occurring fluctuations of density and where spacetime is already denser is where matter accumulates?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tensologist
Dec 22, 2019
1
0
10
About SJB comment, if formation of space-time was a consequence of the so called BB event - as many scientists consider- , then the "pre-existing fabric" in which it happened could not have a spatial nor a temporal nature. It would rather be a "negative net" - to say so- wth no space-time existance where the appearance of an initial zero D singularity (a point with incipient spatial existance) would eventually have arisen (due perhaps to those "density fluctuations" of the primordial grid suggested by Jimdodds).

The subsecuent "unfolding" of the initial 0D singularity into a 1D (linear) reality and then to a 2D ( plane) one and a 3D (volumetric) universe would imply the nested presence of the time factor in each step to produce a new following dimension, "time" being allways the next non-spatial dimension.

In our familiar 3D spatial reality, time is then the 4th dimension - as it is usually considered- along which "reality" unfolds trough.
 
Dec 26, 2019
5
0
30
Mind boggling!
Yup a mind boggler. Considering also in 1952 Einstein wrote, “Physical objects are not in space, but these objects are spatially extended. In this way the concept ‘empty space’ loses its meaning.”

So physical objects being 4D spatially-extended, as @jimdodds put it "fluctuations of density," reflects the fact that what the CERN LHC high-energy physics experiments actually measure is 4D electromagnetic energy density pressure concentrations. Just as AI pattern recognition famously aided in the discovery of the Higgs boson by recognizing collision pattern energy densities.

I suggest the 'Quantum Crisis' CERN LHC experimentalist Maria Spiropulu reported on in 2014 (see at 20:32) arises from the fact the standard model of physics (SM) models the collision pattern energy density concentrations as zero-dimensional (0D) mathematical point particles -- which provide no information content towards replicating the 4D spacetime universe. The Quantum Crisis then being the observed 4D physical properties are conjectured to be hidden dimensional unknown material string or membrane mechanism properties -- which remain undetected at LHC energy levels.

What Is Space-Time? Well, we can only measure 4D spacetime relative to energy density (mass density) concentrations...which concentrations are themselves 4D spatially-extended energy density and mass density integrations. So a new 4D spatially-extended nonstandard model of energy density and mass density integrations is going to be required to resolve the Quantum Crisis, since as Alessandro Fedrizzi and Massimiliano Proietti found Objective Reality Doesn't Exist, Quantum Experiments Shows.

Just as Paul Sutter pointed out in
Where Are All the 'Sparticles' That Could Explain What's Wrong with the Universe?: "Or, more depressingly, they don't exist. And that would mean that these creatures — along with their supersymmetric partners — are really just ghosts dreamt up by feverish physicists, and what we actually need is a whole new framework for solving some of the outstanding problems of modern physics."
 
Last edited:

Tak

Dec 28, 2019
2
0
0
A well written summary for the definition of space-time. I like the history and the introduction of how space-time works, but the focus on a reconciled quantum mechanical model to explain gravity seems like a math problem. A more logical approach might be to consider the 'Big Bang' theory from a pre-existing fabric of space-time without any real matter, as a proposed one dimensional determinant, its inception starts with the unfolding perspective of this dimensional determinant for space-time fabric towards existence. The sequence is somewhat understood from an expansion from our one dimensional space-time into a two dimensional space-time fabric, and then into a three dimensional space-time fabric, and so on. The expectation is that ordinary matter creation took place within a pre-existing dark energy medium of space-time. Indeed, the existence of matter would be an intrusion upon this pre-existing universal medium of space-time which maintains a zero sum difference that is the balance of our cosmological continuum.
With this understanding, any perturbation in this medium would engender a warping of this pre-ordered dark energy template of space-time fabric in the evolutionary perspective of its dimensional unfolding. Wherein the creation of matter as a whole induces a complementary displacement, or warping, in the dark energy medium of the space-time fabric, its promulgation is interdependent on its insistence and persistence. For within this warping, there is yet another pertubation in the whole matter created; a dual relationship of newly created positive density matter in an envelopment of negative density matter. The complementary displacement insulates the newly created positive density matter in an envelopment of negative density matter. This envelope of negative density matter, known as dark matter, then infiltrates the spaces in matter, providing it with the ability to interact, bond, and evolve. Indeed it would require much more dark matter to fill the spaces among ordinary matter down to its smallest constituent parts.
So if dark matter is what engenders a force of gravity for ordinary matter to bond, then the accretion and accumulation of ordinary matter is just the resultant consequence of this force. And if the black holes are nothing but dark matter, then it would also follow that dark matter can be accumulated, separate of ordinary matter. It would therefore also follow that the gravitational force is more representative of negative density mass than positive density mass.
Upon this hypothesis then, one can expect that there is a require transition to separate ordinary matter from its complementary dark matter. It starts first with the disintegration of matter, as a whole, as it interacts with the event horizon of the black hole. As the positive density mass is 'squeezed' upon its own gravitational acceleration toward the black hole, liken to the spaghettification effect, its matter changes to allow for its disintegration via transmutation and the massive release of photons due to alpha decay and beta decay. This is the effect wherein positive density mass is collected within the event horizon, into a plasma, increasing its photon density. This 'squeezing' effect is like extracting out the dark matter from the whole matter, allowing for the ordinary matter to be reduced to its smallest constituent components. The dark matter is then absorbed into the black hole, and the remnants of ordinary matter are discarded and radiated out at high velocity back into the cosmos; to start, once again, to reintegrated into the universe via bonding and evolving.
If you're interested in exploring this concept more, please review the alternative theories presented in the book, 'The Evolutioning of Creation: Volume 2', or even the ramifications of these concepts in the sci-fi fantasy adventure, 'Shadow-Forge Revelations'. The theoretical presentation brings forth a variety of alternative perspectives on the aspects of existence that form our reality.
Sorry, but dark matter has nothing to do with black holes or dark energy. Dark matter is called "dark" because it does not seem to feel any force except gravity. So, it does not by definition interact with electromagnetic energy, meaning that it can't clump up or slow down, which would be necessary to bond in any way with ordinary matter or to form a black hole (which is collapsed ordinary matter). Instead, it just orbits in diffuse clouds around massive objects like galaxies or star clusters withour ever settling down. And dark energy is a force which has nothing to do with either black holes or dark matter, since it seems to pervade the universe uniformly, causing it to expand uniformly at all points. Since it is very weak, it is only measured over very large distances. This is all very well established physics.
 

Tak

Dec 28, 2019
2
0
0
"A person in a superfast rocket will measure time to be moving slower and the lengths of objects to be shorter compared with a person traveling at a much slower speed. "

Um, this is just plain wrong (or maybe just badly expressed). Both of those people would measure their own flow of time and lengths of objects around them in what would be to each them to be completely normal ways. However, when observing each other, each observer would measure the other's time to be passing at a slower rate, and lengths on each other's ships to be compressed in the direction of motion, relative to themselves. The greater the relative motion, the greater the observed effect.
 
Dec 30, 2019
2
0
10
The Space-Time was described in the Po Theory potheory.com

The Po Theory is a new theory of physics presenting fundamental issues, among others construction of space-time and describes the properties of space-time, e.g. its decay (expansion) resulting in the generation of time. In The Po Theory there are many models describing the structure of matter, e.g. particle generation model, particle mass (energy) generation model, preon structure model, etc. All these models are supported by mathematical equations describing the properties of particles such as particle radius, its mass, characteristic time associated with the particle, life time, range of interaction. The Po Theory gives, for example, a formula for calculating the radius of an electron, its mass or electric charge.

Po theory describes the known and yet unknown sets of elementary and fundamental particles, objects that are black holes - collapsars, including the Universe and Bi Universe collapsars. Describes interactions - forces that govern these particles and objects. It shows the correlations between the parameters of these particles and physical constants, symmetries between interactions, and above all determines the basic particle - the Po collapsar. The particle which is the smallest collapsar and the basic particle with the highest mass among the elementary particles, which is part of both planckon and fundamental and elementary particles, which is the basic "building block" of matter.

Po theory was presented in the book: "Po Theory. From the smallest particle to the BiUniverse", www.potheory.com or www.teoriapo.pl

Polish version
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-2LF-htgDbanPKLP5qpFoUFDPnEBGtYK/view?usp=drivesdk

English version
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qTNhhqrgtuK63P06Fa3IhktYQg3YdsIA/view?usp=drivesdk
 
Jan 1, 2020
1
1
0
These ideas are ignoring some plainly obvious facts of logic that blows these theories to smithereans. This article and scientists are really promoting speculation fairy tales that cannot have any logic to them if one does not ignore some obvious facts that contradict these "far out theories" only found in their imaginations.
For example, the definition of "space" is the absence of anything, ie, nothing. Since space is nothing at all, then space cannot be bent, since one cannot bend nothing. There is nothing to bend.
Also, what is time? It is not some substance that floats around the universe as these super silly and illogical ideas state or suggest. Time is also nothing because all time is is the idea that some event happens after another event. We can measure the amount of "time" that passed by using some constant stream of motion that can create clocks or stopwatches. The fact that something happened after another something does not make time some substance that can be bent. Time is only in our minds and also in the movement of things.
So to say space (nothing) is joined with time (also nothing, only our thoughts of knowing which happened first and how long ago) can be bent should be put in Grimm's fairy tales.
To say the gravity is caused by the bending of nothing and nothing fairy tale is an extra illogical fairy tales which tries to explain the unexplainable, gravity. (The only real explanation if our loving Creator made gravity function.)
Also, the speed of light is not constant as scientists in 2015 showed in experiments. They slowed down light photons (search the web for it).
The theory of relativity also has lots of holes in it just using logic. Although it has lots of truth to it, its relative speed and slowing of the ageing and movement of things for those who travel more at the speed of light is a self contradiction. So how does their body know they are traveling at the speed of light to slow everything down? It does not know at all. Besides all speed is relative, so if a rocket takes off from Earth to a star at the speed of light, they are going the speed of light relative to the Earth and the star. But what if there is a 2nd star behind the one they are going to but the 2nd star is moving the speed of light away from earth in the same direction as the rocket. So the speed of the rocket is ZERO mph, not the speed of light. So how does the body now know which speed to age at since it could pick the speed of light for star 1 , or it could pick Zero speed if the rocket decides to go to star 2. Which one does the body pick to age and move at? And how does the body and rocket know which speed to use?
None of this article makes any sense at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tensologist
Jan 5, 2020
2
0
10
I'm not much of a math guru. I received a daily text from deepak Chopra the other day where he said:

At the cosmic horizon 42 billion light years away space expands faster than the speed of light and galaxies disappear. - Deepak❤

So I was thinking that would be where eternal life might reside since its past time. What would life look like at a speed faster than light? Like a deity, that's what.
 
Dec 19, 2019
6
2
35
Sorry, but dark matter has nothing to do with black holes or dark energy. Dark matter is called "dark" because it does not seem to feel any force except gravity. So, it does not by definition interact with electromagnetic energy, meaning that it can't clump up or slow down, which would be necessary to bond in any way with ordinary matter or to form a black hole (which is collapsed ordinary matter). Instead, it just orbits in diffuse clouds around massive objects like galaxies or star clusters withour ever settling down. And dark energy is a force which has nothing to do with either black holes or dark matter, since it seems to pervade the universe uniformly, causing it to expand uniformly at all points. Since it is very weak, it is only measured over very large distances. This is all very well established physics.
Actually there is nothing about black holes or dark matter that is well established. They both remain as subjects of theoretical physics which is in constant variation due to competing theories. So it is really a thought provoking playground and the subject of much discussion. As for your belief that dark energy is a force which has nothing to do with either black holes or dark matter, you still need to consider how they interact to refute my perspective.
 
Apr 9, 2020
1
0
10
Space-time is the universe itself, it is what the universe is. it is 1 or all of maybe infinite states the unavoidable minimal logic category/set of existence itself is materialized. one or all possible ways pure logic manifests itself.
 
Mar 4, 2020
142
12
105
Space-time is not needed to explain any motion. As a matter of fact, the constant length to time ratio is why we see the same motions, no matter the distance and no matter the time.
 
Jan 27, 2020
52
20
55
Ah, space-time that twilight zone where Einstein reigns supreme on the macro-scale where we reside.

Einstein explains that space-time is essentially a "curved" geometric construct that allows for the relativity of simultaneity. In other words, if one observer correctly concludes that two events occur simultaneously, the same events would appear to take place at different times to an observer who was in motion relative to the first observer. Both the observer who measures the two events to be taking place simultaneously, and the observer who measures the events as taking place at different times, are right! Our example above is correct, one observer will see a firecracker they light and a second firecracker that a friend lights explode at exactly the same time, while a third observer moving relative to the other two will see one firecracker explode before the other firecracker. Relativity tells us that both are right!

Both time and space are relative, and are "different" for observers in relative motion to one another. For one observer the two firecrackers actually did explode at precisely the same time, while for the other observer one firecracker exploded a few seconds before the other. The time and distance measured by each observer is different, both are right, neither is wrong.

Einstein-Minkowski space-time is made up of three spatial dimensions x, y, and z, and one time dimension t. Space-time is commonly thought to be the history of the entire universe, containing every "event" that ever happens. A "world-line" is the history of an object in "space-time".

Special relativity allows us to define a distance from the origin for all the points on a world-line, allowing the world-line to be a set of points that have physically distinguishable properties (see illustration below). Therefore, we can identify each of the events on a world-line as distinct points in space-time. Each point on the world-line is a particular event that happens at one place in space (represented by the values of the x, y, z coordinates) at one particular time (represented by the value of the t coordinate) - i.e. one place in space-time. Each point on the world-line of a human being is generally thought to be a real physical event that represents a unique sequential moment in the life of that individual, from birth to death.

Each of us moves through the physical universe on our own unique world-line which is dotted with our experiences.




einstein minkowski world line.jpg
 
Last edited:
Dec 19, 2019
6
2
35
Actually there is nothing about black holes or dark matter that is well established. They both remain as subjects of theoretical physics which is in constant variation due to competing theories. So it is really a thought provoking playground and the subject of much discussion. As for your belief that dark energy is a force which has nothing to do with either black holes or dark matter, you still need to consider how they interact to refute my perspective.
These ideas are ignoring some plainly obvious facts of logic that blows these theories to smithereans. This article and scientists are really promoting speculation fairy tales that cannot have any logic to them if one does not ignore some obvious facts that contradict these "far out theories" only found in their imaginations.
For example, the definition of "space" is the absence of anything, ie, nothing. Since space is nothing at all, then space cannot be bent, since one cannot bend nothing. There is nothing to bend.
Also, what is time? It is not some substance that floats around the universe as these super silly and illogical ideas state or suggest. Time is also nothing because all time is is the idea that some event happens after another event. We can measure the amount of "time" that passed by using some constant stream of motion that can create clocks or stopwatches. The fact that something happened after another something does not make time some substance that can be bent. Time is only in our minds and also in the movement of things.
So to say space (nothing) is joined with time (also nothing, only our thoughts of knowing which happened first and how long ago) can be bent should be put in Grimm's fairy tales.
To say the gravity is caused by the bending of nothing and nothing fairy tale is an extra illogical fairy tales which tries to explain the unexplainable, gravity. (The only real explanation if our loving Creator made gravity function.)
Also, the speed of light is not constant as scientists in 2015 showed in experiments. They slowed down light photons (search the web for it).
The theory of relativity also has lots of holes in it just using logic. Although it has lots of truth to it, its relative speed and slowing of the ageing and movement of things for those who travel more at the speed of light is a self contradiction. So how does their body know they are traveling at the speed of light to slow everything down? It does not know at all. Besides all speed is relative, so if a rocket takes off from Earth to a star at the speed of light, they are going the speed of light relative to the Earth and the star. But what if there is a 2nd star behind the one they are going to but the 2nd star is moving the speed of light away from earth in the same direction as the rocket. So the speed of the rocket is ZERO mph, not the speed of light. So how does the body now know which speed to age at since it could pick the speed of light for star 1 , or it could pick Zero speed if the rocket decides to go to star 2. Which one does the body pick to age and move at? And how does the body and rocket know which speed to use?
None of this article makes any sense at all.
True, all these cosmogonist theories are indeed somewhat like fairy tales [also known as hypotheses] because they are only an nth degree projection of thought manipulation, oftimes supported by nothing other than mathematical equations and/or proofs. They the fairy tales for the scientifically minded that would seek to find a rationale for our existence. I always loved a well written fantasy, but it has to make sense to me.
 
Jan 4, 2020
1
0
10
A well written summary for the definition of space-time. I like the history and the introduction of how space-time works, but the focus on a reconciled quantum mechanical model to explain gravity seems like a math problem. A more logical approach might be to consider the 'Big Bang' theory from a pre-existing fabric of space-time without any real matter, as a proposed one dimensional determinant, its inception starts with the unfolding perspective of this dimensional determinant for space-time fabric towards existence. The sequence is somewhat understood from an expansion from our one dimensional space-time into a two dimensional space-time fabric, and then into a three dimensional space-time fabric, and so on. The expectation is that ordinary matter creation took place within a pre-existing dark energy medium of space-time. Indeed, the existence of matter would be an intrusion upon this pre-existing universal medium of space-time which maintains a zero sum difference that is the balance of our cosmological continuum.
With this understanding, any perturbation in this medium would engender a warping of this pre-ordered dark energy template of space-time fabric in the evolutionary perspective of its dimensional unfolding. Wherein the creation of matter as a whole induces a complementary displacement, or warping, in the dark energy medium of the space-time fabric, its promulgation is interdependent on its insistence and persistence. For within this warping, there is yet another pertubation in the whole matter created; a dual relationship of newly created positive density matter in an envelopment of negative density matter. The complementary displacement insulates the newly created positive density matter in an envelopment of negative density matter. This envelope of negative density matter, known as dark matter, then infiltrates the spaces in matter, providing it with the ability to interact, bond, and evolve. Indeed it would require much more dark matter to fill the spaces among ordinary matter down to its smallest constituent parts.
So if dark matter is what engenders a force of gravity for ordinary matter to bond, then the accretion and accumulation of ordinary matter is just the resultant consequence of this force. And if the black holes are nothing but dark matter, then it would also follow that dark matter can be accumulated, separate of ordinary matter. It would therefore also follow that the gravitational force is more representative of negative density mass than positive density mass.
Upon this hypothesis then, one can expect that there is a require transition to separate ordinary matter from its complementary dark matter. It starts first with the disintegration of matter, as a whole, as it interacts with the event horizon of the black hole. As the positive density mass is 'squeezed' upon its own gravitational acceleration toward the black hole, liken to the spaghettification effect, its matter changes to allow for its disintegration via transmutation and the massive release of photons due to alpha decay and beta decay. This is the effect wherein positive density mass is collected within the event horizon, into a plasma, increasing its photon density. This 'squeezing' effect is like extracting out the dark matter from the whole matter, allowing for the ordinary matter to be reduced to its smallest constituent components. The dark matter is then absorbed into the black hole, and the remnants of ordinary matter are discarded and radiated out at high velocity back into the cosmos; to start, once again, to reintegrated into the universe via bonding and evolving.
If you're interested in exploring this concept more, please review the alternative theories presented in the book, 'The Evolutioning of Creation: Volume 2', or even the ramifications of these concepts in the sci-fi fantasy adventure, 'Shadow-Forge Revelations'. The theoretical presentation brings forth a variety of alternative perspectives on the aspects of existence that form our reality.
Sir, You must explain in one line not the concept of others. To my mind space is created by the matter and after complete annihilation energy was left thus a point mass concept came. As the time lapsed the energy started taking into shape as matter and time begins.
 
Dec 19, 2019
6
2
35
About SJB comment, if formation of space-time was a consequence of the so called BB event - as many scientists consider- , then the "pre-existing fabric" in which it happened could not have a spatial nor a temporal nature. It would rather be a "negative net" - to say so- wth no space-time existance where the appearance of an initial zero D singularity (a point with incipient spatial existance) would eventually have arisen (due perhaps to those "density fluctuations" of the primordial grid suggested by Jimdodds).

The subsecuent "unfolding" of the initial 0D singularity into a 1D (linear) reality and then to a 2D ( plane) one and a 3D (volumetric) universe would imply the nested presence of the time factor in each step to produce a new following dimension, "time" being allways the next non-spatial dimension.

In our familiar 3D spatial reality, time is then the 4th dimension - as it is usually considered- along which "reality" unfolds trough.
The concept of a pre-existing Space-Time fabric has more to do with the concept of potential for the conjoining of Space and Time. Indeed, in my book, 'The Evolutioning of Creation: Volume 2', I sketched out a multidimensional perspective for creation/origin which did start with the concepts of 'No Time' and 'No Space'. I then went on to combine these concepts to include the concepts of 'All Time' and 'All Space', for they are just as infinite and unfathomable as having none at all. Only by analyzing there interactions by degree [i.e. All Time and No Space versus No Time and All Space] did I realize that there are no real constants; for it is only by the nature of their consistency that an existence was able to form at all.

So I never integrated an implication of dimensional 'Time" as being already nested in dimensional 'Space'. For once there is conjoining immixture of the two, it becomes the absence of nothingness, or creation itself. My thought of the pre-existing Space-Time fabric was, as I detailed, a one dimensional determinant of potential inception; a dimensional condition in which All Time and No Space where mediated in a sea of dark energy. So rather I saw Time as separate of Space, and not as an implied nested part of Space. The actual inception of Space-Time starts with the unfolding perspective of this dimensional determinant from the potential of space-time towards realized existence.

Therefore my view is that Time is the first dimensional consideration and not the last. For what is Time but the change that initiates a present reality from that which does not exist.
 
Dec 19, 2019
6
2
35
Sir, You must explain in one line not the concept of others. To my mind space is created by the matter and after complete annihilation energy was left thus a point mass concept came. As the time lapsed the energy started taking into shape as matter and time begins.
I was actually musing about a Time before energy or mass; speculating upon a pre-existing universal medium for a space-time template which maintains a zero sum difference as the balance of our cosmological continuum from wherein the creation of matter as a whole spring forth and induces a complementary displacement, or warping, in the dark energy medium of the space-time fabric. If not for the complementary partnership of ordinary matter with dark matter, the preeminent entification of dark energy would keep ordinary matter from forming at all.
 
Dec 19, 2019
6
2
35
About SJB comment, if formation of space-time was a consequence of the so called BB event - as many scientists consider- , then the "pre-existing fabric" in which it happened could not have a spatial nor a temporal nature. It would rather be a "negative net" - to say so- wth no space-time existance where the appearance of an initial zero D singularity (a point with incipient spatial existance) would eventually have arisen (due perhaps to those "density fluctuations" of the primordial grid suggested by Jimdodds).

The subsecuent "unfolding" of the initial 0D singularity into a 1D (linear) reality and then to a 2D ( plane) one and a 3D (volumetric) universe would imply the nested presence of the time factor in each step to produce a new following dimension, "time" being allways the next non-spatial dimension.

In our familiar 3D spatial reality, time is then the 4th dimension - as it is usually considered- along which "reality" unfolds trough.
The concept of a pre-existing Space-Time fabric has more to do with the concept of potential for the conjoining of Space and Time. Indeed, in my book, 'The Evolutioning of Creation: Volume 2', I sketched out a multidimensional perspective for creation/origin which did start with the concepts of 'No Time' and 'No Space'. I then went on to combine these concepts to include the concepts of 'All Time' and 'All Space', for they are just as infinite and unfathomable as having none at all. Only by analyzing there interactions by degree [i.e. All Time and No Space versus No Time and All Space] did I realize that there are no real constants; for it is only by the nature of their consistency that an existence was able to form at all.

So I never integrated an implication of dimensional 'Time" as being already nested in dimensional 'Space'. For once there is conjoining immixture of the two, it becomes the absence of nothingness, or creation itself. My thought of the pre-existing Space-Time fabric was, as I detailed,
 
Dec 26, 2019
5
0
30
Wouldnt it be good if time travel were possible
Well sarajo we are all time traveling right now - at the speed of light -> in the 4D spacetime metric of general relativity time integrates at the speed of light through the 3 spatial dimensions - meaning 4D spacetime event series of 3D experiences.

So - yeah, it's all good.

As for what is possible vs impossible that's - the rest of the story.
 
Last edited:

ASK THE COMMUNITY