• Welcome to Discovery Month - prizes, podcasts and more await! Explore the thread here.
  • Want to win Lego Fossils and a bundle of Live Science swag? Share your favourite discovery and enter the giveaway here!

The Universe Remembers Gravitational Waves — And We Can Find Them

Nov 28, 2019
30
1
55
About gravitational waves -
A contributor to our Group who sent this article reminded me:
A single mechanical experiment, bringing boundless energy from the gravitational field to the quantum field, performed here on Earth, is worth more than a hundred trillion measurements of supposed accuracy at so many light years apart in the changing and illusory field of empty quantum holes.
He concludes - Paul Sutter did not read your book on Energy extracted from the G-force, nor does he know that this experiment, which brings about boundless energy as Einstein predicted, must first define this Nature of continuous space time. And that this is still ... continuous! Waves are discontinuous impulses. Thus there is a confusion of incompatible terms.
 
Dec 7, 2019
1
0
10
About gravitational waves -
A contributor to our Group who sent this article reminded me:
A single mechanical experiment, bringing boundless energy from the gravitational field to the quantum field, performed here on Earth, is worth more than a hundred trillion measurements of supposed accuracy at so many light years apart in the changing and illusory field of empty quantum holes.
He concludes - Paul Sutter did not read your book on Energy extracted from the G-force, nor does he know that this experiment, which brings about boundless energy as Einstein predicted, must first define this Nature of continuous space time. And that this is still ... continuous! Waves are discontinuous impulses. Thus there is a confusion of incompatible terms.
What is the book's title sir?
 
Dec 7, 2019
2
0
10
Waves aren't a motion which must be discontinuous. You're attempting to define a wave as an entity, but in this case the importance of the wave is it's motion. All this article is referring to is the prediction of a "gravitational memory" by reverberations of gravitational waves against one another. No one here is arguing about utilizing gravitational waves as energy. That's not possible given how little we know about gravity at the moment. These invaluable measurements serve to aid our understanding. Experimentation on light was a bit difficult when we didn't know how light behaved. However, if someone would like to present a hypothesis for this experiment and a sound method for it, please do. Harnessing energy from the weakest natural force would be a breakthrough, especially on a livescience forum.
 
Nov 28, 2019
30
1
55
Waves aren't a motion which must be discontinuous. You're attempting to define a wave as an entity, but in this case the importance of the wave is it's motion. All this article is referring to is the prediction of a "gravitational memory" by reverberations of gravitational waves against one another. No one here is arguing about utilizing gravitational waves as energy. That's not possible given how little we know about gravity at the moment. These invaluable measurements serve to aid our understanding. Experimentation on light was a bit difficult when we didn't know how light behaved. However, if someone would like to present a hypothesis for this experiment and a sound method for it, please do. Harnessing energy from the weakest natural force would be a breakthrough, especially on a livescience forum.
dear Tharm23,
It seems to me that in a discussion forum the respondent needs to read what was said, then study what was said. I did not propose a debate about hypotheses or proposals for experiments. I am making an experiment conclusion communication and offering the power companies the machines that Einstein predicted. Therefore, the debate is already at the level of finding out who puts the invention to use, because I can't find them. I am asking for advice on how to act to be received by those interested in clean, cheap, limitless energy to end the cries of climate danger and power outages.
 
Dec 7, 2019
2
0
10
You're making an "experiment conclusion communication" with no experiment to conclude. What experiment was performed? None. A hypothesis for an "experiment conclusion communication" without an experiment. If you're Keen on a "gravitational energy- harnessing machine", make it. Or, study energy yourself without riding on the back of a book proposing conspiracy theories. You've put forth a claim with no evidence but a book you've read. You've cited your evidence by the same book. Let me tell you; no one knows for sure how gravity is produced. There's theories all the way down to a partical for it's interactions (graviton). Pick up a text book, and any of them will cite this same conclusion. If you wish to metaphorically build a theoretical car without knowing the mechanics of the motor, then I wish you luck. If you insist this is possible, do it. Stop wasting your time explaining something, put your Harvard degree into action. Until then, I'll continue my studies of the practical findings of physics, not wishing to build a house before I know how to pour concrete. Continue to preach free energy machines if you like, but it's my hope that everyone here is sensible enough to know that a generation struggling immensely with the creation of fusion energy isn't bothered with creating a generator that runs on unsubstantiated books, poor grammar, and leaps of theory.
 
Nov 28, 2019
30
1
55
You're making an "experiment conclusion communication" with no experiment to conclude. What experiment was performed? None. A hypothesis for an "experiment conclusion communication" without an experiment. If you're Keen on a "gravitational energy- harnessing machine", make it. Or, study energy yourself without riding on the back of a book proposing conspiracy theories. You've put forth a claim with no evidence but a book you've read. You've cited your evidence by the same book. Let me tell you; no one knows for sure how gravity is produced. There's theories all the way down to a partical for it's interactions (graviton). Pick up a text book, and any of them will cite this same conclusion. If you wish to metaphorically build a theoretical car without knowing the mechanics of the motor, then I wish you luck. If you insist this is possible, do it. Stop wasting your time explaining something, put your Harvard degree into action. Until then, I'll continue my studies of the practical findings of physics, not wishing to build a house before I know how to pour concrete. Continue to preach free energy machines if you like, but it's my hope that everyone here is sensible enough to know that a generation struggling immensely with the creation of fusion energy isn't bothered with creating a generator that runs on unsubstantiated books, poor grammar, and leaps of theory.
Sorry for the lack of grammar that did not allow me to communicate.

Maybe I'm the ignorant who doesn't know how ignorant I am. So I am asking the wise (you) to tell me how I can find the companies that can receive my invention, because after 16 iron models that I put into operation, at least I can go to a workshop and train the mechanical engineers of the companies to do it. The same as I already did.

As for Harvard, I agree to listen to their wisdom. On the condition that I can show in practice what I have done, with the explanations I will have to give.



Finally, I request the intervention of the forum administrator to allow me to find the companies to whom I will give the invention, and free me from miscommunication like this, where I say I already did the mechanics and the commentator is deaf to the information, and he says it is by lack Grammar. I repeat that I already made the machine and just need to find out who will profit from it.
 
Nov 28, 2019
30
1
55
I return to explain:

What does the intelligent American citizen think of the G-Force prophesied by Einstein to provide energy without consumption and without limit? This force will be discovered; and it can happen in another country; a patriotic citizen wants the inventor to bring this discovery to America; and will help to prevent it from being used by the enemies of the American dream. But the ignorant and arrogant citizen, ignoring how ignorant he is, will be a tremendous danger to America at this time. With his opposition, doubts and discussions of rights, about knowledge he has not attained and interests he supposes, he will be opening the door for knowledge thieves to destroy the greatest invention in history that would happen anyway. And you understand that?
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY