I always hark back to the warmth experienced during the Age of the Dinosaurs.
Note the following article:
Hot-house climate during the Triassic/Jurassic transition: The evidence of climate change from the southern hemisphere (Salt Range, Pakistan)
by
ShahidIqbalab,
MichaelWagreich,
JanIrfan Uc,
Wolfram MichaelKuerschner, SusanneGierb and
MehwishBibi
The Triassic–Jurassic boundary interval was characterised by the change from warm, semiarid–arid to a hot and humid climate in the Tethyan domain linked to input of greenhouse gases from the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP) activity and
Pangaea breakup. This study provides the very first outcrop evidences of palaeoclimatic evolution during the Triassic–Jurassic boundary interval in the then
southern hemisphere, along the eastern margin of
Gondwana facing the western
Tethys. In the Tethyan Salt Range of Pakistan a succession of Upper Triassic dolomites, green-black shales (Kingriali Formation) to overlying Lower Jurassic quartzose
sandstones, shales,
laterites and conglomerates (Datta Formation) represents the sedimentary archives of this critical time interval. Bulk and clay
mineralogy of the Upper Triassic shales indicate the presence of mainly
illite while kaolinite is a minor component. The kaolinite content, a reflection of the mature stage of chemical weathering and hence hot–humid conditions, increases up-section in the overlying shales and sandstone–shale succession. The following laterite–bauxite horizons lack illite and are entirely composed of kaolinite,
boehmite and
haematite. The bulk rock
geochemistry of the succession confirms a similar trend. The Chemical Index of Alteration (CIAmolar) displays an increasing trend from the Upper Triassic (CIA 68–80) to the overlying Lower Jurassic strata (CIA 90–97). The overall results for the succession reveal an increasing chemical maturity trend from
Rhaetian to
Hettangian thereby supporting a change from warm-arid to a hot and humid
palaeoclimate, probably extreme greenhouse conditions. Similar changes in the clay mineralogy and sediment geochemistry across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary have been reported from basins across Europe. Thus the Salt Range provides sections from the southern hemisphere for correlations across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary.
See:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921818118301000
The Triassic-Jurassic extinction event was the fourth major global extinction of the Phanerozoic eon. The event occurred around 201 million years ago at the end of the Triassic Period (a period that lasted from 252-201 million years ago). The extinction event was a combination of smaller global extinction events that occurred over the last 18 million years of the Triassic period. Over this period, life on both land and ocean was affected. It is estimated that about 50% of the known living species during this period completely disappeared. In total 76% of terrestrial and marine species and 20% of all taxonomic families were wiped out. It is believed that the Triassic-Jurassic extinction allowed the dinosaurs to thrive and dominate the niches left by extinct animals.
Many scientists believe that the events may have resulted from rising sea levels and climate change. The rise in sea levels may have been as a result of the sudden release of carbon dioxide from the volcanic activities as the supercontinent
Pangea was rifting. During the rifting of the supercontinent, the global greenhouse effect may have been strengthened, raising the air temperature across the globe.
1-s2.0-S0921818118301000-ga1.jpg
See:
https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-triassic-jurassic-extinction.html
main-qimg-8bd659308c240fb8ff53410c8497d4d1-pjlq
The age of the dinosaurs was about 250 MYA to 65 MYA,As you can see from the graph, it was generally about 10 deg. C. warmer over that interval than it is today. In fact, today is historically as cold as it has ever been on the planet. So is global warming going to kill us?
John Doner
PH.D in Mathematics (operations research), University of Michigan (Graduated 1972)
There is no “normal temperature.” The Earth’s climate has been through all kinds of changes. It’s been hotter, it’s been colder, and for quite some time when the planet was formed, it didn’t even have an oxygen atmosphere.
Matt Riggsby
MA Archaeology, Boston University
Nd isotope constraints on ocean circulation, paleoclimate, and continental drainage during the Jurassic breakup of Pangea
by
GuillaumeDeraa,
JonathanPruniera,
Paul L.Smith,
James W.Haggart,
EvgenyPopov,
AlexanderGuzhove,
MikhailRogov,
DominiqueDelsateg,
DetlevThies,
GillesCuny,
EmmanuellePucéat,
GuillaumeCharbonnier,
GermainBayon
The breakup of
Pangea and onset of growth of the
Pacific plate led to several paleoenvironmental feedbacks, which radically affected
paleoclimate and ocean chemistry during the Jurassic. Overall, this period was characterized by intense volcanic degassing from
large igneous provinces and circum-Panthalassan arcs, new
oceanic circulation patterns, and changes in heat and humidity transports affecting continental weathering. Few studies, however, have attempted to unravel the global interactions linking these processes over the long-term. In this paper, we address this question by documenting the global changes in continental drainage and surface oceanic circulation for the whole
Jurassic period. For this purpose, we present 53 new
neodymium* isotope values (
εNd(t)) measured on well-dated fossil fish teeth, ichthyosaur bones, phosphatized
nodules, phosphatized ooids, and
clastic sediments from Europe, western Russia, and North America.
Combined with an extensive compilation of published
εNd(t) data, our results show that the continental sources of Nd were very heterogeneous across the world. Volcanic inputs from a Jurassic equivalent of the modern Pacific Ring of Fire contributed to radiogenic
εNd(t) values (− 4
ε-units) in the Panthalassa Ocean. For the Tethyan Ocean, the average surface seawater signal was less radiogenic in the
equatorial region (− 6.3), and gradually lower toward the epicontinental peri-Tethyan (− 7.4), western Russian (− 7.4) and Euro-Boreal seas (− 8.6). Different Nd sources contributed to this disparity, with radiogenic Nd influxes from westward Panthalassan currents or juvenile
volcanic arcs in open oceanic domains, and substantial unradiogenic inputs from old Laurasian and Gondwanan shields for the NW Tethyan platforms. Overall, the
εNd(t) values of Euro-Boreal, peri-Tethyan, and western Russian waters varied quite similarly through time, in response to regional changes in oceanic circulation, paleoclimate, continental drainage, and
volcanism. Three positive shifts in
εNd(t) values occurred successively in these
epicontinental seas during the
Pliensbachian, in the Aalenian–Bathonian interval, and in the mid-Oxfordian.
The first and third events are interpreted as regional incursions of warm surface radiogenic currents from low latitudes. The Aalenian–Bathonian shift seems linked to volcanic outbursts in the NW
Tethys and/or circulation of deep currents resulting from extensional events in the Hispanic Corridor and reduced influences of boreal currents crossing the Viking Corridor. In contrast, the
εNd(t) signals decreased and remained very low (< − 8) during the global warming events of the
Toarcian and Late Oxfordian–Early
Tithonian intervals. In these greenhouse contexts, a latitudinal expansion of humid belts could have extended the drainage pathways toward boreal Nd sources of
Precambrian age and increased the supply of very unradiogenic crustal-derived inputs to seawater. Finally, a brief negative
εNd(t)excursion recorded in parallel with regional drops in seawater temperature suggests that southward circulation of cold unradiogenic Arctic waters occurred in the NW Tethys in the Callovian–Early
Oxfordian. All these results show that changes in surface oceanic circulation resulting from the Pangean breakup could have regionally impacted the evolution of seawater temperatures in the NW Tethys.
1-s2.0-S1342937X14000562-fx1.jpg
* Neodymium - The most important use for neodymium is in an alloy with iron and boron to make very strong permanent magnets. This discovery, in 1983, made it possible to miniaturise many electronic devices, including mobile phones, microphones, loudspeakers and electronic musical instruments. These magnets are also used in car windscreen wipers and wind turbines.
Neodymium is a component, along with praseodymium, of didymium glass. This is a special glass for goggles used during glass blowing and welding. The element colours glass delicate shades of violet, wine-red and grey. Neodymium is also used in the glass for tanning booths, since it transmits the tanning UV rays but not the heating infrared rays.
Neodymium glass is used to make lasers. These are used as laser pointers, as well as in eye surgery, cosmetic surgery and for the treatment of skin cancers.
Neodymium oxide and nitrate are used as catalysts in polymerisation reactions.
Neodymium was discovered in Vienna in 1885 by Karl Auer. Its story began with the discovery of cerium, from which Carl Gustav Mosander extracted didymium in 1839. This turned out to be a mixture of lanthanoid elements, and in 1879, samarium was extracted from didymium, followed a year later by gadolinium. In 1885, Auer obtained neodymium and praseodymium from didymium, their existence revealed by atomic spectroscopy. Didymium had been studied by Bohuslav Brauner at Prague in 1882 and was shown to vary according to the mineral from which it came. At the time he made his discovery, Auer was a research student of the great German chemist, Robert Bunsen who was the world expert on didymium, but he accepted Auer's discovery immediately, whereas other chemists were to remain sceptical for several years.
A sample of the pure metal was first produced in 1925.
See:
https://www.rsc.org/periodic-table/element/60/neodymium
From the above, it can be readily seen that the Earth has been decidedly warmer in prehistoric times for a myriad of reasons. And it also appears, in defense of the statements by Matt Riggsby of Boston University, that the Earth has no "normal" temperature. We, inhabiting the current epoch, need to realize that we are living in the coolest period in the Earth's history. We also need to remember that the few extra degrees of warmth found in the oceans has resulted in a greater beneficial CO2 uptake by phytoplankton.
Every relief system, every fossil and every earthquake results in additions to our informational base, about what we are and where we're going. As believers in science and the scientific method, we need to bear a lot of facts in mind and not to be swayed by junk science and to understand the so called "facts" designed to enable governments to exert greater control over us.
The Earth's temperature, continental drift, plate tectonics, ocean currents and the smallest inhabitants of our water world, all have a part to play in climate. We, as star children, have an insatiable need to explore our Earth and the surrounding space in order to understand the processes which hold sway over our collective futures.
Hartmann352