No theory is valid, without knowing what mass is. We only know how mass reacts to influence, we have no idea why it reacts to influence. Or exactly what mass really is. We can not observe mass. All we can observe is a blur, a fuzzball. When we stimulate mass with energy, we only observe the reaction, not the mass. And around and around it goes. We just keep spinning around, for 100 years so far.
Nothing can be discerned, until we know the structure of that blur. Many believe that at that scale, structure has no meaning and even.....that structure can not exist. I believe that the structure of mass, gives us all the properties of mass.
I personally believe that mass and physicality is much simpler than the current rationales. Or I should say, lack there of. We have a narrative for light and gravity, but none for mass. Light and gravity come from mass. Do you see the confoundment?
The dogma of light and gravity prevents us from understanding mass. We limit what mass can be from the requirement of agreeing with light and gravity.
We have constructed a trap, which is fool proof. And fool is the keyword.