New Theory to Understand the Mechanism of Gravitation

[Hartmann352]

June 30, 2020

By Nader Bhutto

See: https://www.academia.edu/85695503/N...ism_of_Gravitation?email_work_card=view-paper

In general relativity, the effects of gravitation are ascribed to space-time curvature instead of being attributed to the force and the free-falling objects move along the locally straight paths in curved space-time. General relativity has experienced considerable success because of its way of predicting phenomena like the precession of Mercury’s perihelion and binary pulsars, warping space-time, gravitational red-shifting of light, the relativistic delay of light, the equivalence principle, the geodetic and frame-dragging effects that have been regularly confirmed. However, general relativity absolutely offers no description of the causation of space-time curvature and there is no mechanism to describe why gravity works the way it does. Furthermore, it cannot be considered as the complete theory of gravity due to its incompatibility with quantum mechanics. There is nothing in Newton's Theory or General Relativity that explains the origin of energy that produces the gravitational forces. In fact, there is no known energy source to support the tremendous energy expenditure that attracts all objects on the surface of our planet for over 4.5 billion years.
Hartmann352

​

 

[Debed]

June 30, 2020

By Nader Bhutto

See: https://www.academia.edu/85695503/N...ism_of_Gravitation?email_work_card=view-paper

In general relativity, the effects of gravitation are ascribed to space-time curvature instead of being attributed to the force and the free-falling objects move along the locally straight paths in curved space-time. General relativity has experienced considerable success because of its way of predicting phenomena like the precession of Mercury’s perihelion and binary pulsars, warping space-time, gravitational red-shifting of light, the relativistic delay of light, the equivalence principle, the geodetic and frame-dragging effects that have been regularly confirmed. However, general relativity absolutely offers no description of the causation of space-time curvature and there is no mechanism to describe why gravity works the way it does. Furthermore, it cannot be considered as the complete theory of gravity due to its incompatibility with quantum mechanics. There is nothing in Newton's Theory or General Relativity that explains the origin of energy that produces the gravitational forces. In fact, there is no known energy source to support the tremendous energy expenditure that attracts all objects on the surface of our planet for over 4.5 billion years.
Hartmann352

​

Gravity is not a force.

 

[TheBox]

June 30, 2020

By Nader Bhutto

See: https://www.academia.edu/85695503/N...ism_of_Gravitation?email_work_card=view-paper

In general relativity, the effects of gravitation are ascribed to space-time curvature instead of being attributed to the force and the free-falling objects move along the locally straight paths in curved space-time. General relativity has experienced considerable success because of its way of predicting phenomena like the precession of Mercury’s perihelion and binary pulsars, warping space-time, gravitational red-shifting of light, the relativistic delay of light, the equivalence principle, the geodetic and frame-dragging effects that have been regularly confirmed. However, general relativity absolutely offers no description of the causation of space-time curvature and there is no mechanism to describe why gravity works the way it does. Furthermore, it cannot be considered as the complete theory of gravity due to its incompatibility with quantum mechanics. There is nothing in Newton's Theory or General Relativity that explains the origin of energy that produces the gravitational forces. In fact, there is no known energy source to support the tremendous energy expenditure that attracts all objects on the surface of our planet for over 4.5 billion years.
Hartmann352

​

Gravity-A , the force that attracts matter to other matter , can be viewed as a conservation of charge force (not to be mistaken for the conductance force) .

All matter can be considered to be attracted to other matter because of the grounding process of charge .

In particle physics , the Proton can be considered a conservation of charge particle and each proton has a high , maybe unlimited capacitance .

This mechanism allows a particles conserved charge to converge with other particles , regardless of their capacitance .

This can be proven with a humble balloon and electrostatic charge by ''sticking'' the balloon to a vertical wall .

The measure of the force between two bodies can be measured on a set of scales and is denoted in kg . This measure is called the mass of an object .

When mass one applies a force on mass two , mass two equally applies a force on mass one .

mass = kg/2

F=Gm1+m2

Gravity-A is a linear force f(-x)=G^a

A falling object experiences F=Gm1+m2*a2 when hitting the ground .

Quantum Buoyancy is what stops all things being in the same place at the same time . Quantum Buoyancy is an effect of gravity-B .

Below explains the distance between orbiting objects f(+x)=G^b

 

[marvas]

General relativity has experienced considerable success because of its way of predicting phenomena like the precession of Mercury’s perihelion and binary pulsars, warping space-time, gravitational red-shifting of light, the relativistic delay of light, the equivalence principle, the geodetic and frame-dragging effects that have been regularly confirmed.

Except it's succes is based on doctored or illogical experiments which resort to helium to change the wavelength of light, in order to illogically prove a prediction of general relativity which has nothing to do with helium, i.e. a gravitational redshift. Which doesnt exist because it was confused with a refractional redshift which appeared as they added a bag of helium in the g-shift experiment, which otherwise could not produce any 'gravitational redshift' whatsoever. And the observed redshift of the sun and stars is a refractional redshift caused by the refraction of their light into space, which increases its wavelength proportional with the speed, according to the equations f=v/lambda, v=c/n. So when the speed of light increases the wavelength also increases. Like dooh !

The relativistic delay of light does not exist either because it's a delay caused by the slowing of light in the atmosphere of massive objects, according to the equation v=c/n, where n is the index of refraction. So as its speed decreases, it will obviously take a slightly longer time for light to travel the same distance. Like doooh !

So why do you keep repeating this experimental non-sense when I obviously disproved it ?

I also disproved quantum mechanics, so the reason they are incompatible with each other is because they are both wrong. And that is also the reason why no one understands them, not even their creators. Because they are both junk science, or pseudo science, which can be easily disproved as I have shown.

 

[marvas]

Einstein fanboys don't even understand refraction, and think they can understand gravitation...