Mysterious particles spewing from Antarctica defy physics

Jan 24, 2020
1
0
0
Visit site
I wonder if they are "spewing" in all areas of the earth...which is not known due to the only (I assume) monitor is in Antarctica. Put a monitor at 3rd & Main and see whats what.
 
Jan 24, 2020
5
3
35
Visit site
There are at least ten major neutrino observatories world wide, both underwater and in deep mines. Data from them should help. The obvious candidate would be a dark matter particle interacting with an atom relatively near the detector. This should be doubly rare; dark matter doesn't interact much and there should be very few high energy dark matter particles.

Not predicting this rare observation is hardly the major problem with the "standard model". The large number of free parameters is much worse.
 
Jan 24, 2020
2
2
0
Visit site
I wonder if they are "spewing" in all areas of the earth...which is not known due to the only (I assume) monitor is in Antarctica. Put a monitor at 3rd & Main and see whats what.

You can't. The point of having the detectors in Antarctica is that it avoids some of the noise of neutrinos that come from the Sun. Neutrinos do "spew" through the Earth in all directions, but most of them are radiation from the Sun.

What's making these things fly out of the frozen continent?

They're flying all the way through the Earth. Matter is highly transparent to neutrinos (to the low-energy ones, at least).

What's to say they're coming through the earth and not reflecting off the snow/ice?

They can't reflect off of snow or ice. Neutrinos rarely interact with matter at all, and if they did interact with the ice they wouldn't be detected elsewhere.
 
Jan 24, 2020
2
2
0
Visit site
Not predicting this rare observation is hardly the major problem with the "standard model". The large number of free parameters is much worse.

The number of free parameters doesn't make the model incomplete. Those parameters are most likely determined arbitrarily and explained by applying the anthropic principle, given that even tiny deviations from most of them lead to a Universe incapable of supporting stars/planets/life.

The Standard Model remains annoyingly accurate. We've been building bigger and bigger colliders and detectors for decades and have yet to find any contradictions, which is unfortunate for physics.
 
Jan 24, 2020
1
1
0
Visit site
The neutrinos are not passing through the whole earth, but rather are being generated there as a by product of fission. I've been to the base under the ice in Antarctica.
NASA could verify this by using three separated detectors so as to triangulate the source.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stuart21
Jan 24, 2020
1
1
0
Visit site
How about fission being generated by the ongoing alien presence under the Antarctic ice, Documented by several USAF whistleblower pilots and others who talk about witnessing UFOs and the no fly zone, complete with enormous whole in the ice.....what where those GPS coordinates again?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Truthseeker007
Jan 25, 2020
1
1
0
Visit site
How about fission being generated by the ongoing alien presence under the Antarctic ice, Documented by several USAF whistleblower pilots and others who talk about witnessing UFOs and the no fly zone, complete with enormous whole in the ice.....what where those GPS coordinates again?
Actually, it is more likely to be the infamous MIL (Mother-in-law) particle. They're not really all that rare, but they only show up at the most inconvenient and unpredictable times and appear to primarily function as trouble initiators and/or chaos generators...
🤣 😜 🤣
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Nytowl223
Jan 26, 2020
8
4
35
Visit site
How about fission being generated by the ongoing alien presence under the Antarctic ice, Documented by several USAF whistleblower pilots and others who talk about witnessing UFOs and the no fly zone, complete with enormous whole in the ice.....what where those GPS coordinates again?
I've been looking at the Antarctic on Google Earth and am convinced the Alien activity in the Antarctic is far beyond what anyone thinks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Truthseeker007
How about fission being generated by the ongoing alien presence under the Antarctic ice, Documented by several USAF whistleblower pilots and others who talk about witnessing UFOs and the no fly zone, complete with enormous whole in the ice.....what where those GPS coordinates again?

I think that is very possible. Many will tell you on here though to put on your tin foil hat because you thought outside the box and perimeters of most humans perception on this mind controlled society.
 
Feb 1, 2020
1
1
10
Visit site
The number of free parameters doesn't make the model incomplete. Those parameters are most likely determined arbitrarily and explained by applying the anthropic principle, given that even tiny deviations from most of them lead to a Universe incapable of supporting stars/planets/life.

The Standard Model remains annoyingly accurate. We've been building bigger and bigger colliders and detectors for decades and have yet to find any contradictions, which is unfortunate for physics.
At each point in history scientists believe (almost) all is known. Quantum field theory is an expansion of interactions in the occupation number representation in terms of Standard Model particles, much like the Fourier expansion of a function. The free parameters are analogous to Fourier coefficients, determined by experiment. A unified theory will provide the exact interaction corresponding to the infinite series of the (off-shell) Feynman diagrams. At this point all free parameters will be calculable. Is this not a more satisfying viewpoint than the anthropic principle?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nytowl223
Feb 24, 2020
16
2
35
Visit site
Seems like an awful lot is not panning out lately. Perhaps it's time to reevaluate our gauges and scales and how things are tried and tested. We may not have a grasp on physics and well, anything really. Maybe math. Does anything defy any math problems that people had thought they figured out?
 
May 10, 2021
8
0
30
Visit site
The ANITA experiment (radio antennas suspended from a helium balloon at 37 km height) detects radio waves produced when high-energy neutrinos (~10^18 eV) interact with the ice sheet.
Polarization of these radio waves can tell the direction from where the neutrino came. It was expected that all such neutrinos will come from above, as Earth should absorb neutrinos of this energy coming from the other side of Earth.
However, a couple of events indicate just that. The intense neutrino source was ruled out with a more sensitive experiment (IceCube).
Whatever anomaly ANITA detects, IceCube should detect more of it. Since it didn't, it was concluded that cosmic rays did reflect off the ice but for some reason did not change polarization.

I find that very strange - more likely, this is physics beyond standard model.
 
Modern science tells us that the theories of mass, the standard model and quantum mechanics, and the theories of gravity, space-time, are the MOST proven theories of all time.

But using these proven theories, they have failed to stir plasma in a pot for over 40 years. And no one yet, can tell you what an electron even looks like. And the space-time and gravitational theories, fail to simulate 3 or more bodies. And another math invention is needed, dark matter, to explain a star's velocity.

And yet, these genius theories are held in high esteem and almost worshiped. It's a matter of faith, not science. And then they have the gall, to criticize people of faith.

Modern science is a false science. This blind ignorance comes from the false conception of light. This false conception leads to the constant false measurement, and thus, the false finding, that light has a constant velocity. And our current crop, and our past crop of mathematicians.....have to use local time to explain the velocity of light.

As long as science believes that light is a constant wave, we will never understand mass and gravity.

Light is not and does not wave. It's intermittent and does not have frequency, it has duty cycle.