Higgs boson possibly caught in act of never-before-seen transformation

Sep 20, 2020
11
0
30
Visit site
Can anyone point in the direction of the universe where the Big Bang occurred?

Is it possible people created a Higgs muon that started motion in the universe?

If motion first started on earth, it would explain why the cosmic red shift points to the earth at the center of the universe, maybe because motion first started here? see: ” The red shift hypothesis for quasars: Is the earth the center of the universe? - Astrophysics and Space Science August 1976. “ The recently generated Higgs boson muon experiment at LHC in Cern in 2012 ..the Higgs muon may have decayed faster than the speed of light as predicted.

Could people have started motion in the universe by generating a particle that allegedly went faster than the speed of light ? (with a 10 Billion Dollar man made machine that is colder than the 3 kelvin universe vs the LHC at 2 kelvin and creating a particle that goes back into time - 15 billion + years ago, ) when there was no motion - just motionless static gravity fields and that particle started motion, (gravitational) instability, the microwave background was then formed as a result of the instability, that created dust particles and matter in the universe ?

Was this the time the universe started to fall (expand) into another static gravity field past the microwave background?

When was the last time the universe was at 2 Kelvin ?
The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory on the Formation of the Universe

When the Universe started to fall. When did Motion Start?
(1) The expansion of the universe is a result of the " heat ' contained therein;

(2) The source of the " heat " is the cosmic microwave radiation background at 3 Kelvin,
wherein;

(3) The microwave electro magnetic-nuclear energy was formed as a result of the
interaction of two different static gravitational vacuum fields, causing gravitational instability and the motion, void of matter, at this time,

wherein; static gravitational field ( Helium 4 ? ) (1) began to go into "motion".

Therefore; the interaction of (2) motionless / static gravity vacuum fields, ( Helium 3 and Helium 4 ? ) could eventually create dust particles in the Universe that later form into stars, galaxies , planets, moons and other objects in or about their current locations.

When did motion first start?

Science knows the formation of matter in our universe was caused by the forces of the

universe.

These forces are:

(1) The Force of Gravity

(2) The Force of Electro Magnetism

(3) The Strong Nuclear Force

(4) The Weak Nuclear Force

At some point in time, motion within the universe, had to begin.
The paradox would be, what force could cause motion to begin, without moving in its
present space-time ?

The Gravitational Cosmological Theory was
developed from an is rooted in the Einstein Steady State Theory and the Bondi-Gold-Hoyle Steady State Theory,

Wherein the Steady State Theory the universe,
contains more protons than electrons that
create dust particles and
galaxies formed in their current locations and the cosmic
matter is recycled therein at the center of the galaxy furnace.
------------
When the Universe started to fall:
The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory on the Formation of the Universe.
The Theory:
(1) The expansion of the universe is a result of the " heat ' contained therein;
(2) The source of the " heat " is the cosmic microwave radiation background at 3 Kelvin,
wherein;
(3) The microwave electro magnetic-nuclear energy was formed as a result of the interaction of two different static gravitational vacuum fields, ( Helium 2 and Helium 4 gravity ? ) causing gravitational instability and the motion, void of matter, at this time, wherein; static gravitational field (1) began to go into "motion".

Therefore; the interaction of (2) motionless / static gravity vacuum fields, could eventually create dust particles in the Universe that later form into stars, galaxies , planets, moons and other objects in or about their current locations.


Q: When did this motion start?
A: If a neutral particle is able to resist the universal motion, in theory, that particle
would go back in time. Going back in time the neutral particle would then enter into (1)
of the (2) motionless-static gravity vacuum fields void of motion, and cause an unbalance
and gravitational instability and this interaction would create motion and energy
particles.
Therefore; the interaction of (2) motionless / static gravity vacuum fields, ( now thanks to Mr Peebles, one Baryonic gravity vacuum field and one Non Baryonic vacuum field ) could eventually create dust particles in the Universe that later form into stars, galaxies , planets, moons and other objects in or about their current locations.

Q: What causes a gravitational static vacuum field in the first place ?
A: Pressure force is used to create a vacuum on Earth, perhaps an exotic something
100,000 times weaker than the force of gravity decays, causing a static-motionless gravity vacuum field.

Q: What created the motionless gravity vacuum fields in the first place ?

A: Vacuums are created by pressure so the only answer I can think of is a created gravity vacuum pressure from the future goes back in time to start motion in the past.

( theory needs improvement - help yourself )
 
Sep 20, 2020
11
0
30
Visit site
Im sorry for your mother's meth problem. This might help her.

A Photo of the comet Ison showing the redshift of cosmic light in the background stars pointing to Earth as the center of the universe. ?



Wikipedia photo of the comet Ison, *( 2012-2013 ) notice the redshift of light of the stars in the background....to me it does shift but in what direction ...the redshift of light means its moving away from Earth ?

Notice the red shift of cosmic light in the back ground stars in the Comet Ison where are they pointing to and moving away from ? Is it the Earth ? why does it look that way ? Did people start motion here on Earth ?

If motion first started on earth, it would explain why the cosmic red shift points to the earth at the center of the universe, maybe because motion first started here? see: ” The red shift hypothesis for quasars: Is the earth the center of the universe? - Astrophysics and Space Science August 1976. “
 
Sep 20, 2020
11
0
30
Visit site
From 1985, wow, they question if MUONS decay faster than the speed of light ?

If Muons do decay faster than the speed of light, then what ?

Will the muon decay go back in time before motion even started to start motion in the universe inside a static graviy vacuum field , maybe of helium 3 and 4 gravity field, ( left over from another universal cycle ? ) since helium 3 and 4 can not freeze ?


The Net Advance of Physics - MIT
web.mit.edu › redingtn › www › netadv › ftlNuSwift


[Physics Letters B 158, 227 (1985)]; Are muon neutrinos faster-than-light particles? ... Breaking the light speed barrier by O. I. Chashchina and Z. K. Silagadze [Acta ... Neutrinos Exist but not Higgs Bosons? by Burra G. Sidharth [2012/01] Argues ... [2011/11]; Non-Standard Neutrino Propagation and Pion Decay by Massimo ...


Question: If the universe is at 3 Kelvin and the LHC at Cern operated at 2 Kelvin then :

When was the last time the universe was at 2 Kelvin ?

If you support the Big Band theory as is, then your answer might be never, why ?
 
Sep 20, 2020
11
0
30
Visit site
In your opinion how, where and when did motion first start ?

If the universe created itself as the late Stephen Hawking alleges - and Im sure you argee with the late Mr Hawking that: " The universe created itself ? "

The aren't people part of the universe ?

Is there anything in the universe other than human beings on earth that can created a 10 billion dollar machine that operates at 2 Kelvin and can generate a Higgs muon that allegedly can decay faster that the speed of light ?

Can the decay of these man made Higgs muons go back in time to a place where there is no motion ?

If so, would this mean that people started motion in the universe and why the redshift of cosmic light has everything moving away from the Earth, maybe because motion first started here ?
 
Sep 20, 2020
11
0
30
Visit site
What happened in 1054 AD?

The Crab Nebula was formed

" Tracing the expansion back revealed that the nebula must have become visible on Earth about 900 years before. Historical records revealed that a new star bright enough to be seen in the daytime had been recorded in the same part of the sky by Chinese astronomers on 4 July 1054, and probably also by Japanese observers a few weeks earlier. " source Wikipedia

I'm not saying people made the Crab Nebula to look like Africa in 1054 AD, but was it a call from the past for help from a people facing genocide ?

( can African drums and song et al, echo to the sky ?)



The Crab Nebula looks like Africa ?

A photo of the Crab Nebula that corresponds to the bright SN 1054 supernova recorded by ancient astronomers in AD 1054. ( wikipedia )

A map of Africa, do you see the shape or fractal of Africa in the Crab supernova image ?

They say the Crab Nebula star explosion happened in1054 AD ?

What happened in 1054 AD?

" The East–West Schism (also the Great Schism or Schism of 1054) is the break of communion since the 11th century between the Catholic Church and Eastern Orthodox Churches. "

read



re does the Crab nebula look like Africa ? Is it possible people created a Higgs muon that started motion in the universe?

What if the Ethopian Coptic Church was in union with the Church of Rome before the Portugues explorers arrived in Africa around 1400 AD .

If the Ethopian Coptic Church and the Roman Catholic Church where in union would there have been as much Western African slavery ?

Is it just coincidence or are people able to do things we think are impossible ?

Like create new things like civilization ?

=================================

From ask Ethan Forbes article Aug 14th 2020 story : " Why Are The Moon And Sun The Same Size In Earth’s Sky? "

When you ask the question, “what are the odds that an Earth-like planet will have a Moon that’s comparable in angular size to the Sun,” you’re really asking what the odds are of:

  • having an Earth-like planet, which is an Earth-sized planet at the right distance from its star for liquid water on its surface,
  • that experienced a giant impact in its early history, creating a synestia,
  • where the planet itself winds up rotating rapidly after that collision,
  • where a large, inner moon gets created but won’t fall back onto the planet,
  • and then spirals away as angular momentum gets transferred from the planet to the Moon.

It’s remarkable that science, "
It may affirm; " the universe created itself " as the late Steven Hawking alleged and people are part of that universe and may have started motion ?
 
Last edited:
1985.png


727.png



Hmmmmm. In thought explorations like this, I tend to wonder 'to what end?'. As in the face of evidence, the humanity of even scientists gets in the way of reckoning the world. Hell, my existence, expression, and receipt of such corroborate that 'test'. In any case, I think your work needs a different audience, beau.
 
Oct 24, 2020
1
0
10
Visit site
The universe didn't spawn from a distal arm of a spiral galaxy. If it were the center, everything would be expanding away from it.

Even this solar system doesn't have the Earth at the center, no matter how much you want it to be.

The Earth would also be the home to the oldest matter in the universe. We have found matter that has fallen to the Earth that is 7 billion years old. That makes it 2.5 billion years older than the Earth, and almost that to the Sun.

In the whole lifespan of the known universe, our home rock, and the whole neighborhood, is fairly new. New enough, where civilizations in other galaxies have come and gone many times over, before there was even an Earth to stand on.

But, to the question of which particle came first, I have no clue. Maybe someday we'll figure it out. This may has
brought us just a little bit closer to understanding.