Doomsday Clock is now 100 seconds from midnight

Jan 23, 2020
1
4
5
It is sad how far mainstream science has fallen, resorting to meaningless gestures and game-show props to hype pseudo-scientific hoaxes and Chicken Little "the sky is falling" nonsense. Hitching your wagon to brainwashed dupes like Greta Thunberg and grifters like Al Gore is the furthest thing from real science that you can get.
 
Jan 1, 2020
20
12
35
Quite obviously the warming is correlated to the chemical composition of the atmospheric dispersal of particulate matter that has been called "geo engineering " that has been taking place since the 1960s as has been seen with the patents lists taken out in 1980s- 2012 in the fcc lists of the United states by their military. Correlation of these materials dumped to the atmospheric effects that follow have been seen by millions of people and commented regularly at much denial but when articles applied the term "geo engineering " to the same methodology and patents usages of the types of things seen in the sky around the world combined with new 5g technologies that implement the required radiowave usage of the HAARP stations we must consider that the possibility doesnt just exist that it's a now capable and utilized and rather EFFECTIVE means of controlling ckimate change. Especially when they are laying groundwork for things such as a climate change "movement" galvanized by fear and deception at the hands of whomever is at the control of such a technology. Whats also considerably the more frightening thing to consider is the scientific misleading of a population when carbon in the atmosphere is what proliferates green plant vegetation growth and taking that OUT of the cycle will continue to worsen the lessening if oxygen production as a result. What my suggestion is find the CAUSE of the problem instead of masking it under a chemical reaction of carbon and sunlight when its more possible the new 5G radiation combined woth the fine particles of heavy metals dispersed by planes in their geoengineering having the effect of excitation of those particles ... essentially ionizing the atmosphere and causing upward heating/cooling as a result.

This is what they dont want you to know...
Your Government manages your atmosphere with those 5g towers. Hemce their control of the narritive and the lack of information available about the 5g towers installed every 100 meters that they never asked public permission to install. And that using these towers they control the weather the information present and the people that are involved cannot disclose the information due to fear of reprisal . As for the narrative the media are vastly invested in keeping control of your concepts of what is and what isnt real. Testing things for yourself finds these answers. And anyone whom actually tests these concepts finds themselves targeted by those whom work towards stopping this information from becoming public.
Kinda like propaganda utilized to control nations like in ww2 ...aint it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Truthseeker007
Jan 23, 2020
6
5
10
my grandfather was a freemason, i lived with him, he was a engineer on atom bombs and reactors. the freemasons were drinking in the basement when i was a kid, we talked about the ice caps. led to how thick they were and i said whats going to happen to them, all of them told me its the end of the ice age dummy, the earth is going to flood back to its normal state and look like it was when dinosaurs roamed the planet. general education does not tell you this, i had to hear it from the most brilliant scientist on the earth. 12000 years ago was the beginning of it melting but not the end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Truthseeker007
Jan 17, 2020
17
6
35
It is sad how far mainstream science has fallen, resorting to meaningless gestures and game-show props to hype pseudo-scientific hoaxes and Chicken Little "the sky is falling" nonsense. Hitching your wagon to brainwashed dupes like Greta Thunberg and grifters like Al Gore is the furthest thing from real science that you can get.
What a ridiculous comment. Pretending that climate change is some new, non-scientific concept or "hoax" per the staunchest denialists, is laughable. The science behind the conclusions on climate change was solid long before Al Gore was even known by anyone, and before climate change was a household concept. The science is strong and sound, the problem is people like you turned it into a political issue because you didn't like the idea of dealing with the consequences.
 
Jan 23, 2020
6
5
10
What a ridiculous comment. Pretending that climate change is some new, non-scientific concept or "hoax" per the staunchest denialists, is laughable. The science behind the conclusions on climate change was solid long before Al Gore was even known by anyone, and before climate change was a household concept. The science is strong and sound, the problem is people like you turned it into a political issue because you didn't like the idea of dealing with the consequences.
i told you the truth, the ice caps are left over from a cataclysm and will melt even if the planet has no life. humans might accelerate it but its for sure a happening before our civilization wrote on paper.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Truthseeker007
Jan 24, 2020
1
2
15
It is sad how far mainstream science has fallen, resorting to meaningless gestures and game-show props to hype pseudo-scientific hoaxes and Chicken Little "the sky is falling" nonsense. Hitching your wagon to brainwashed dupes like Greta Thunberg and grifters like Al Gore is the furthest thing from real science that you can get.
Your hypothesis is that "mainstream science" has fallen. Please show your evidence to prove it. While you're at it, please define "mainstream science" and what you mean by "fallen".

Greta Thunberg and Al Gore have read the science. They've seen the evidence. They are responding to the conclusions of scientists who study the climate, conclusions based on analysis of the data. This is science.

Your opinion calling them "brainwashed" and climate change warnings "nonsense" is just that, your opinion. Without evidence to back it up, without an analysis of data, without a consensus conclusion your opinion is, "...the furthest thing from real science that you can get."
 
  • Like
Reactions: JeetsN123 and dk72
Jan 17, 2020
17
6
35
Your hypothesis is that "mainstream science" has fallen. Please show your evidence to prove it. While you're at it, please define "mainstream science" and what you mean by "fallen".

Greta Thunberg and Al Gore have read the science. They've seen the evidence. They are responding to the conclusions of scientists who study the climate, conclusions based on analysis of the data. This is science.

Your opinion calling them "brainwashed" and climate change warnings "nonsense" is just that, your opinion. Without evidence to back it up, without an analysis of data, without a consensus conclusion your opinion is, "...the furthest thing from real science that you can get."
Exactly. It's ironic that they refer to those who may not be scientists, but are proponents of what the actual scientists are saying and concluding, as "brainwashed"....while taking a stance of science denialism because they don't like what the science clearly shows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JeetsN123

Urquiola

BANNED
Jan 18, 2020
38
2
55
A hypothetical timepiece called the Doomsday Clock measures our nearness to armageddon — by nuclear weapons, climate change and other global threats.

Doomsday Clock is now 100 seconds from midnight : Read more
I come in anger every time I hear about guys counting the seconds to a 'Nuclear Holocaust', impossible, see comments in SciAm by Asteroidminer to the thread: 'Will we ever come to the grips with nuclear weapons? Even in the times of highest number of nuclear warheads, detonation of it all simultaneously would have been less than 1 in 10'000 of total needed to annihilate life on Earth, thus, somebody wants to live with luxury and have a herd of followers by crying Wolf!, where no animals exist, this is an oax, anxiety inducing, a criminal offense.
The consequences of Global Warming, already showing, are much worse, but both Donald Trump and Vlad Putin said this is a humbug, they are non-believers, negationists.
Both Psychopaths and Stalinists have denial mechanisms, they don't believe in reality.
Trump blames China for Greenhouse emissions, but about emissions, is better talking about emissions per inhabitant, not emissions per country. Check and compare!
Poor of us! Gesund +
 
Jan 25, 2020
1
1
15
A hypothetical timepiece called the Doomsday Clock measures our nearness to armageddon — by nuclear weapons, climate change and other global threats.

Doomsday Clock is now 100 seconds from midnight : Read more
This is a good article as it relates to what should be addressed to avoid annihilation. However, 70 years on after 1947 no one would launch a nuclear war and expect to survive beyond launch day in 2020. Surely, whomever launches first strike nuclear acquisition, whether right, warranted or otherwise, becomes an instance public target worldwide. The odds of survivability for anyone who attempts first strike tactical nuclear attack is not even remotely possible. Lethal find public appearances would leave whoever it is acquired. There would be no place to hide in public ever again. Nuclear weapons beyond 1945 meant one thing only, defense. Any offensive nuclear strike in 2020 and beyond is lethal to anyone who launches such suicide. And it is absolutely just that. At least one billion grandmothers, some even with Alzheimer's disease, would insist on the death of whoever launches first strike. There would be a lot of no-nooky until the boys carried it out. Extremely unscientific, but you can believe it.

And Global Warming/Climate Change? There is not a REAL scientist in the world that will argue that the climate hasn't been changing for 4.5 billion years and won't continue to change nor should it. It is not wise to enter a bated argument of climate scale with anyone who utilizes weather/climate data generated in a limited time scope post 1880. 90% of our Earth-time past climate and temperature has been cooler than today, and sometimes much cooler, however, 10% of our Earth-time past climate and temperature has been warmer, and sometimes much warmer than today. The real argument is one of good stewardship of our Earth. And rightly, corporations with good stewardship of our environment is a huge media advantage in the 21st century. More unforgiving in terms of Doomsday is our planet running out of oil, natural gas and coal that ends next century. For oil? There is 44 years of remaining Proved Oil Reserves on Earth. Probable Recoverable Reserves are also taken up in shear growth within a decade of this. 188 countries have less oil than the U.S. consumes in one year. 147 countries have less oil than the U.S. consumes in ten days. And, 123 countries have less oil than the U.S. consumes in one day. When hoarding begins the Doomsday clock ticks up critically. Our world needs to get to Thorium reactors (that can't blow up), recycling nuclear waste such as Bill Gates' TerraPower, tidal surface energy, garbage to energy existing technologies, and electric vehicles quickly and massively, and, much faster than our current progress. Private funding for wind and solar is fine if you can afford it but most of the world can't. One in five humans of this world does not have access to electricity, for starters. If the United States attempted to replace oil, natural gas and coal with solar PV it would require approximately one acre in every 6.79 acres of the entire United States, excluding surface water acreage, or, 6 acres for every megawatt needed at-load. The United States currently does not have the desire to deforest the country to power it up by those who've done the real math. The Doomsday Clock is a good navigator for recognition of what needs to be addressed, and for some issues, more promptly. No doubt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Truthseeker007
Dec 26, 2019
218
50
130
It is sad how far mainstream science has fallen, resorting to meaningless gestures and game-show props to hype pseudo-scientific hoaxes and Chicken Little "the sky is falling" nonsense. Hitching your wagon to brainwashed dupes like Greta Thunberg and grifters like Al Gore is the furthest thing from real science that you can get.
It's definitely a religion to them. I am just waiting for them to create their climate god. Wait that is Al Gore. :LOL:
 
Dec 26, 2019
218
50
130
Quite obviously the warming is correlated to the chemical composition of the atmospheric dispersal of particulate matter that has been called "geo engineering " that has been taking place since the 1960s as has been seen with the patents lists taken out in 1980s- 2012 in the fcc lists of the United states by their military. Correlation of these materials dumped to the atmospheric effects that follow have been seen by millions of people and commented regularly at much denial but when articles applied the term "geo engineering " to the same methodology and patents usages of the types of things seen in the sky around the world combined with new 5g technologies that implement the required radiowave usage of the HAARP stations we must consider that the possibility doesnt just exist that it's a now capable and utilized and rather EFFECTIVE means of controlling ckimate change. Especially when they are laying groundwork for things such as a climate change "movement" galvanized by fear and deception at the hands of whomever is at the control of such a technology. Whats also considerably the more frightening thing to consider is the scientific misleading of a population when carbon in the atmosphere is what proliferates green plant vegetation growth and taking that OUT of the cycle will continue to worsen the lessening if oxygen production as a result. What my suggestion is find the CAUSE of the problem instead of masking it under a chemical reaction of carbon and sunlight when its more possible the new 5G radiation combined woth the fine particles of heavy metals dispersed by planes in their geoengineering having the effect of excitation of those particles ... essentially ionizing the atmosphere and causing upward heating/cooling as a result.

This is what they dont want you to know...
Your Government manages your atmosphere with those 5g towers. Hemce their control of the narritive and the lack of information available about the 5g towers installed every 100 meters that they never asked public permission to install. And that using these towers they control the weather the information present and the people that are involved cannot disclose the information due to fear of reprisal . As for the narrative the media are vastly invested in keeping control of your concepts of what is and what isnt real. Testing things for yourself finds these answers. And anyone whom actually tests these concepts finds themselves targeted by those whom work towards stopping this information from becoming public.
Kinda like propaganda utilized to control nations like in ww2 ...aint it.
Wow! Precisely Conrad!!:) You hit the nail on the head and very well said. Don't worry though look forward to being called a conspiracy nut and tin foil hat wearer for speaking the truth. I do find it funny they are still using terms from the 60s used by the CIA to squash anybody's research into the loon category. Humans are very easily manipulated.
 
Dec 26, 2019
218
50
130
my grandfather was a freemason, i lived with him, he was a engineer on atom bombs and reactors. the freemasons were drinking in the basement when i was a kid, we talked about the ice caps. led to how thick they were and i said whats going to happen to them, all of them told me its the end of the ice age dummy, the earth is going to flood back to its normal state and look like it was when dinosaurs roamed the planet. general education does not tell you this, i had to hear it from the most brilliant scientist on the earth. 12000 years ago was the beginning of it melting but not the end.
That is quite interesting. And of coarse they want to make money on the deal by blaming it on humans.
 
Dec 26, 2019
218
50
130
Your hypothesis is that "mainstream science" has fallen. Please show your evidence to prove it. While you're at it, please define "mainstream science" and what you mean by "fallen".

Greta Thunberg and Al Gore have read the science. They've seen the evidence. They are responding to the conclusions of scientists who study the climate, conclusions based on analysis of the data. This is science.

Your opinion calling them "brainwashed" and climate change warnings "nonsense" is just that, your opinion. Without evidence to back it up, without an analysis of data, without a consensus conclusion your opinion is, "...the furthest thing from real science that you can get."
Al Gore and Greata? Really?:ROFLMAO:You have really bit hook line and sinker haven't you? To each their own. Some people have a religion such as scientology and others have one called climate change. Let me guess Greata is the angel of the god Al Gore.:LOL:

If Al Gore really believes in it why does he still live in a mansion and fly around in his jet? He should be living off the grid. He is not living off the grid so that tells you something. And are you even sure Greata can even read? She just fell victim to the elite using her as a pawn. That is all that is to it. Somehow people with down syndrome are credible now? Really?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThiccHarambe
Dec 26, 2019
218
50
130
A hypothetical timepiece called the Doomsday Clock measures our nearness to armageddon — by nuclear weapons, climate change and other global threats.

Doomsday Clock is now 100 seconds from midnight : Read more
Nothing like some good fear porn every now and then.:DChristians have their antichrist and leftist have their climate change and nuclear weapons. The world won't end until the sun supernovas. Then it will be called a day in a few billion years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThiccHarambe
Jan 26, 2020
3
3
15
It is sad how far mainstream science has fallen, resorting to meaningless gestures and game-show props to hype pseudo-scientific hoaxes and Chicken Little "the sky is falling" nonsense. Hitching your wagon to brainwashed dupes like Greta Thunberg and grifters like Al Gore is the furthest thing from real science that you can get.
Exactly, it's pretty disgusting actually. What's even more disgusting is the simple fact that scientists who don't believe in these fear mongering conspiracies are constantly attacked and labeled as "liars" even when they provide evidence proving these lunatics wrong. If you don't abide by the climate change agenda than that just makes you a homophobic racist bigot intolerant fascist, at least according to these lunatics. REAL scientists don't hide behind nor do they push mainstream conspiracies nor do they use their position to push political agendas such as majority of climate "scientists".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Truthseeker007
Jan 26, 2020
3
3
15
What a ridiculous comment. Pretending that climate change is some new, non-scientific concept or "hoax" per the staunchest denialists, is laughable. The science behind the conclusions on climate change was solid long before Al Gore was even known by anyone, and before climate change was a household concept. The science is strong and sound, the problem is people like you turned it into a political issue because you didn't like the idea of dealing with the consequences.
You sound like the type of individual who's okay with fear mongering the masses into believing that we're all gonna die in 12 years if we don't do anything about "climate change". Whats funny is the simple fact that there are countless scientists who have disproved the politically motivated climate change conspiracy that is constantly regurgitated by the lefts "scientists" what's even more funny is the simple fact that all these fear mongering climate change scientist activists are all apart of the left, literally. What's pathetic though is the fact that all the REAL NON POLITICALLY MOTIVATED scientists that have disproved the fear mongering climate change activist scientists all get labeled as "liars, conspiracy theorist nuts, bigots" etc. By the left and their beloved scientists and MSM.
 
Jan 27, 2020
1
2
35
Plus, that's not even mentioning things like the highly flammable methane gas being exposed because of the permafrost melting and how that will affect life on earth
Or
The series of volcanos (Calderon?) under YellowStone National park that are ready to erupt and the destruction that will occur
Or
The other Calderons around the earth ready to blow
Or
The increase of destructive activity around the Pacific ring of fire
Or
The shifting earth plates on the west coast discovered some years AFTER there was a prophecy that California would fall into the ocean,
None of those things were mentioned in the article.
Oh & speaking pf climate change/global warming, this is THE WARMEST WINTER I've ever seen in the state of Ohio!
 
Jan 17, 2020
17
6
35
You sound like the type of individual who's okay with fear mongering the masses into believing that we're all gonna die in 12 years if we don't do anything about "climate change". Whats funny is the simple fact that there are countless scientists who have disproved the politically motivated climate change conspiracy that is constantly regurgitated by the lefts "scientists" what's even more funny is the simple fact that all these fear mongering climate change scientist activists are all apart of the left, literally. What's pathetic though is the fact that all the REAL NON POLITICALLY MOTIVATED scientists that have disproved the fear mongering climate change activist scientists all get labeled as "liars, conspiracy theorist nuts, bigots" etc. By the left and their beloved scientists and MSM.
No, there are not countless scientists who have disproven climate change. It's widely accepted by scientists worldwide that know the most about the topic. It was already in the scientific literature well before it ever became a political issue. Even scientists working for and paid by the fossil fuel industry, such as Exxon, came to the same conclusions through their research decades ago. Not too long ago there was a release of some of the scientific conclusions from petroleum industry scientists, and those conclusions were found in their studies as far back as the 1980's. Your ignorance of the issue doesn't change any of that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nsgrace
Dec 26, 2019
218
50
130
No, there are not countless scientists who have disproven climate change. It's widely accepted by scientists worldwide that know the most about the topic. It was already in the scientific literature well before it ever became a political issue. Even scientists working for and paid by the fossil fuel industry, such as Exxon, came to the same conclusions through their research decades ago. Not too long ago there was a release of some of the scientific conclusions from petroleum industry scientists, and those conclusions were found in their studies as far back as the 1980's. Your ignorance of the issue doesn't change any of that.
I think the problem is that it is all blamed on normal humans. When the most important factor is Geoengineering that needs to stop. Things are not just black and white and clear cut. It is obvious when you look at it that climate change has become an agenda against your normal everyday people that just want to enjoy life and have a family and not control the world. It is obvious it is being used as another way to control the humans.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ThiccHarambe

Urquiola

BANNED
Jan 18, 2020
38
2
55
This is a good article as it relates to what should be addressed to avoid annihilation. However, 70 years on after 1947 no one would launch a nuclear war and expect to survive beyond launch day in 2020. Surely, whomever launches first strike nuclear acquisition, whether right, warranted or otherwise, becomes an instance public target worldwide. The odds of survivability for anyone who attempts first strike tactical nuclear attack is not even remotely possible. Lethal find public appearances would leave whoever it is acquired. There would be no place to hide in public ever again. Nuclear weapons beyond 1945 meant one thing only, defense. Any offensive nuclear strike in 2020 and beyond is lethal to anyone who launches such suicide. And it is absolutely just that. At least one billion grandmothers, some even with Alzheimer's disease, would insist on the death of whoever launches first strike. There would be a lot of no-nooky until the boys carried it out. Extremely unscientific, but you can believe it.

And Global Warming/Climate Change? There is not a REAL scientist in the world that will argue that the climate hasn't been changing for 4.5 billion years and won't continue to change nor should it. It is not wise to enter a bated argument of climate scale with anyone who utilizes weather/climate data generated in a limited time scope post 1880. 90% of our Earth-time past climate and temperature has been cooler than today, and sometimes much cooler, however, 10% of our Earth-time past climate and temperature has been warmer, and sometimes much warmer than today. The real argument is one of good stewardship of our Earth. And rightly, corporations with good stewardship of our environment is a huge media advantage in the 21st century. More unforgiving in terms of Doomsday is our planet running out of oil, natural gas and coal that ends next century. For oil? There is 44 years of remaining Proved Oil Reserves on Earth. Probable Recoverable Reserves are also taken up in shear growth within a decade of this. 188 countries have less oil than the U.S. consumes in one year. 147 countries have less oil than the U.S. consumes in ten days. And, 123 countries have less oil than the U.S. consumes in one day. When hoarding begins the Doomsday clock ticks up critically. Our world needs to get to Thorium reactors (that can't blow up), recycling nuclear waste such as Bill Gates' TerraPower, tidal surface energy, garbage to energy existing technologies, and electric vehicles quickly and massively, and, much faster than our current progress. Private funding for wind and solar is fine if you can afford it but most of the world can't. One in five humans of this world does not have access to electricity, for starters. If the United States attempted to replace oil, natural gas and coal with solar PV it would require approximately one acre in every 6.79 acres of the entire United States, excluding surface water acreage, or, 6 acres for every megawatt needed at-load. The United States currently does not have the desire to deforest the country to power it up by those who've done the real math. The Doomsday Clock is a good navigator for recognition of what needs to be addressed, and for some issues, more promptly. No doubt.
I can respond to your denial of truth with a song by Georges Brassens, 'Mourir pour des ideees' -To die for ideas: 'La question se pose aux victimes novices, mourir pour des idees, c'est bien beau, mais lesquelles? -The question is asked to novice victims: to die for ideas is very beautiful, but: for which ones? What I'm sure is I don't want to die for your delusions, your confusion between your conveniences and reality, your conveniences and law, confusion between your selfishness and good or evil. You may end wanting euthanasia, as nsdap did with common deliquents when in lack of enough resources from allied strategic bombings; No, we won't give you that relievement, you'll go through the climate catastrophe you helped build, will be boiled or fried same as anybody else. Erwache! DáDá Siegt! Agur. Raus!
The DoomDay Clok is an hoax, terrorism. btw: who will be the DoomsDay judge? For sure not the character in 'Who killed Roger Rabbit?'
 
Mar 6, 2020
70
16
55
Al Gore and Greata? Really?:ROFLMAO:You have really bit hook line and sinker haven't you? To each their own. Some people have a religion such as scientology and others have one called climate change. Let me guess Greata is the angel of the god Al Gore.:LOL:

If Al Gore really believes in it why does he still live in a mansion and fly around in his jet? He should be living off the grid. He is not living off the grid so that tells you something. And are you even sure Greata can even read? She just fell victim to the elite using her as a pawn. That is all that is to it. Somehow people with down syndrome are credible now? Really?
Actually, Greta Thunberg has Asperger's, not down syndrome. Besides, people with these conditions are still perfectly capable human beings, just with different minds. Its sad that you denounce her for her difference, yet can't accept what years of science have proved.
 
Mar 15, 2020
1
0
10
my grandfather was a freemason, i lived with him, he was a engineer on atom bombs and reactors. the freemasons were drinking in the basement when i was a kid, we talked about the ice caps. led to how thick they were and i said whats going to happen to them, all of them told me its the end of the ice age dummy, the earth is going to flood back to its normal state and look like it was when dinosaurs roamed the planet. general education does not tell you this, i had to hear it from the most brilliant scientist on the earth. 12000 years ago was the beginning of it melting but not the end.
Ding ding ding we have a winner I’ve been saying this ever since politicians and supposed “Scientists” have been crying over climate change publicly and to anyone who does their research it’s easy to see that this climate change topic is merely just another and a long list of fear mongering techniques used to keep the public distracted and weak. The earth tilts on an axis as it rotates around the sun and is not on a perfect balance in every so many hundreds of thousands of years our polls begin to wobble and shift causing global climate changes that would have occurred whether humans existed or not and this is going to lead to Massive changes across the globe as well as natural catastrophes due to those changes and if these people were any real scientists with the Publics interests in mind Then they wouldn’t be fear mongering and making people think that we’re destroying the planet and doomed to annihilation but rather educating people on what naturally occurs and how we as a species can adapt with it because I’m sorry driving electric cars while being a smarter proposition then fossil fuels isn’t going to stop global warming
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY