- Nov 11, 2019
It is a ribbon - comprised of many of these 'strings' - that holds up the earth into its position. These strings are being cut one by one. What will happen when they are all cut I wonder?
Seems to me these strings you're talking of are not supporting your brain any longer.It is a ribbon - comprised of many of these 'strings' - that holds up the earth into its position. These strings are being cut one by one. What will happen when they are all cut I wonder?
No he didn't. It's a matter of perspective and therefore opinion. Personally inflation first, if it even happened, makes far more sense. This article by Ethan Siegel gives a nice explanation: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2019/10/22/what-came-first-inflation-or-the-big-bang/amp/You thought wrong.
This is an unlikely toy theory, though since it is testable they should go for the test.A new study may help answer one of the universe's biggest mysteries.
Yes, in a manner of speaking, since it depends on your definition of "big bang" [ https://profmattstrassler.com/2014/03/26/which-parts-of-the-big-bang-theory-are-reliable/ ]. That illustration is old, and inappropriate to the article science (see * below).No he didn't. It's a matter of perspective and therefore opinion.
Science writer and scientist John Gribbin also theorizes inflation before the Big Bang. https://www.amazon.ca/Before-Big-Bang-Kindle-Single-ebook/dp/B00T6L43NYNo he didn't. It's a matter of perspective and therefore opinion. Personally inflation first, if it even happened, makes far more sense. This article by Ethan Siegel gives a nice explanation: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2019/10/22/what-came-first-inflation-or-the-big-bang/amp/
Quite. But it is a bit dated [I see a review from 2015; oddly the book isn't supplied with a publishing year, but perhaps it is a direct-to-ebook work] and from what I can glean even Gibbins seems to stay in the tradition of putting a time limit on inflation. The inflation theory is a bit odd as well. looks like some mishmash of early Guth and Linde theories, and gives bubble universes. Planck 2018 constrains inflation physics from observation and gives an indefinite ("eternal") inflation process with natural pocket universes instead. (Bubble universe comes from a different kind of physics.) I'm not saying that it's time to popularize the latest, most likely inflation observations (though maybe it is), just that authors should start reject the junk - such as, arguably*, claims of a definite time of inflation or of an underlying positive spatial curvature et cetera. The second video I linked to (links show up in the forum version of comments) is in that "good" tradition. Of course, the most important junk to reject is the claim that big bang started in a specific, small volume or defining it as the first process since the latter definition is both problematic and seems discarded by most young generation cosmologists.Science writer and scientist John Gribbin also theorizes inflation before the Big Bang. https://www.amazon.ca/Before-Big-Bang-Kindle-Single-ebook/dp/B00T6L43NY
Time in classical physics and in Einstein's RelativityYou guys keep coming up with all sorts of nonse without any objective and undeniable facts to prove your statements
If the universe had been formed from the nonsensical so-called " the big bang of a point of origin " , what would have been outside the original point before it exploded to expand itself ?
There had to be an open space surrounding the original compacted point for it to have space to explode and expand . Without any open space surrounding that original point , there would have been no way for it to expand .
So what would have been the open space surrounding that assumed original point , if it had not been the iniverse itself?
No matter whatever sort of wild imagination which you guys can come up with , none of you guys can answer that simple question which obviously can put all your nonsrnsical theories into a garbage bin
Take a rubber balloon for an example to help you guys visualize how such an imagined expanding universe would have happened as do ignorantlly claimed
You have a balloon , and if you want to blow air into it to expand it size , there had to be an open space surrounding it for it to be able to expand .
If you guys cover it with some hard material such as metal sheets , it will certainly not be able to expand in any way , no matter how much more air and how hard you guys can try to blow into it .
So it is obvious that there had had to be an open space surrounding that assumed original point before it exploded as do wildly imagined by such human fiction novelists as you guys
Again , what sort of thing would have been the open space surrounding the original point , if it had not been the universe itself?
If it had not been the universe itself , it would be nonsensical being contradictory to human concept of the universe which is the largest space or the largest set containing all forms of exitence or being
If it had been the universe itself , it would still be totally nonsensical , because how on earth one thing can have two different sizes at the same time like saying you guys can have two different bodies of different sizes at the sa.e time
It is totally absurd to claim that the universe was formed by such a nonsrnsical big bang to expand from an original point to the infinite space as it is today
I can tell you guys that all what you guys have been taught at schools of all levels of education are merely relative truths or subjective reality by human subjective interpretation based on their ignorance or too limited knowledge of the structure and mechanism of the universe which have created all.mstters or all forms of exitence or being in the universe , including the Earth and all the beings on it
Such human concepts of time or space time , direction and dimension exist only within human limited knowledge and the boundary of the limited space observable to human limited knowledge, bit never exist outside the boundary of that limited space , in the infinite space of the universe
There are only two fundamental concepts in objecive reality of the whole universe which are :
1) different forms of existence or being and their transformations
2) their endless motions by the interractions among their gravitational fields and forces
All other concepts are human -created to serve ham ignorance of the structure and mechanism of the universe to help them interpret what they can observe in the universe in a certain way
The human concepts of time and space are actually the same natural phenomenon , bit not at all two different separate things as always so misunderstood by all human beings
The humam concept of time originated in the earth's motions or rotation around its axis and its movements around the Sun . Human beings became aware of the changes of the amount of sun light shine on the Earth's surface and the changes between sunlight and darkness while the Earth was rotating around its axis , and gradually found the changes in weather conditions while the Earth was moving around the Sun , then the concept of the changes of the Earth's states and positions gradually became human concept of time
So the human concept of time is founded on their awareness of the changes of the volume of sunlight and day time with sunlight and night time without sunlight or with darkness , and each cycle of sunlight and darkness later was interpreted by human beings as being composed of 24 main different states of the Earth with different amount of sunlight shone on the Earth's surface as it rotated around its axis and the rested cycle of 4 main different weather conditions as the Earth moved around the Sun , and they noticed that it took about 365 times of a compete cycle of changes between sunlight and darkness by the Earth's rotation around its axis to cover the four different or distinct patterns of weather conditions now known as 4 seasons of 365 also days
Each complete rotation circle which the Earth makes around its axis is equal to one state of sunlight and one state of darkness which is a day today .
One complete rotation circle is approximayely equal to the Earth's circumference which is a distance or a value in length of space
And similarly each of the 24 states is equal to one hour today can be converted to a length of space or a distance by dividing the Earth's circumference by 24 , the by 1440 for the value of one minute , and by 8640 for the value of 1 second , and by multiplying the Earth's circumference by 365 times also so for the distance of a complete evolution which the Earth makes
So it is obvious that all the human concepts of time like year , month, week, day , minute and second are nothing else other than the distances made by the Earth's rotation around its axis and movements around the Sun
Now I guess you guys are begging to understand what i am saying , which have never been taught at any best university in the world , and will help all mankind stop wasting their energy on such nonsrnsical theories and the non-existent
I don't have enough time to go on .But I promise you guys will hear what you guys have never ever heard of in the world of natural science , and will witness an unprecendented events which topple s lot of acknowledged human scientific achievements in both natural science and social science
Could we have more detail on these strings of yours that appear to be holding up the earth like a child's mobile?It is a ribbon - comprised of many of these 'strings' - that holds up the earth into its position. These strings are being cut one by one. What will happen when they are all cut I wonder?