Live Science undermines itself with articles such as these. It needs to distance itself from religious proselytising. The Bible was written by paid scribes hundreds of years after Jesus was supposed to have lived to fuel a cult. Romans were meticulous record keepers and never mentioned someone called Jesus, so he certainly wasn't as famous and people in the U.S. make out today with countless of English-language 'interpretations' they call Bibles which are being quoted in this article.
Wrong! The 'Life of 12 Caesars', by Suetonio, dead AD 126, cites a police authority in the times of Tiberio chased jews out of Rome, 'because they started frequent quarrels because of a certain Cresto', Cresto is a latinized version of the Greek title 'Christus', meaning 'Anointed', in hebrew 'Messiah', but in the days of that Tiberio, Romans did not distinguish between jews and Christians.
What was made centuries after is the Bible version compiled by Ben-Asher, a converse to jewish faith, who worked on this in order that all jews in Diaspora had the same sacred texts. There are translations of Gospel to languages other than Greek and Latin, perhaps as early as 3d century AD. For sure texts differ; even today, you can hear in a Holy Mass the same Gospel by same Evangelist, same text, and what is read differs to such degree that you can even have contradictory interpretations.
An easy example is an OT text where a lover promises his beloved woman offering her porpoises' furs: porpoises, dolphins, have never been used in furriery, while in old times, there were seals in the Mediterranean, seals have a furrery use.
If you don't want to adhere to the Christ revelation, it's your decision, consequences are yours, but it has little sense supporting this in bibliography issues, these realms have little or no overlap. Blessings +