These doctors are saying that it's pointless to lock down because of an exceedingly low death rate from Coronavirus. They are citing 5000 test results. Debunkers are claiming sampling error due to the fact the tests were conducted on people seeking the test. The doctors also cite Sweden's no-lock down approach as being manageable, and without the overwhelming death spike that the media warns of. Debunkers point out that Sweden has 22 deaths per 100k, as opposed to around 7 in other scandinavian countries.
I think the sampling error is totally offset by the number of symptom free carriers that do not seek testing. In Iceland, 50% of carriers are symptom free. In the US, 3,300 people were tested in prisons, and 96% of carriers are symptom free. If this amount of carriers are symptom free, then I agree the lockdowns are totally pointless, and are more medically harmful than helpful. There is a high morbidity associated with unemployment and inactivity. It's harmful psychologically and physically. The higher death rate in Sweden is expected, and simply reflects a higher curve rather than a flatter curve. The peak is not overwhelming and hastens herd immunity. With an extremely low death rate, I'm a proponent of "spiking" rather than "flattening" the curve.