To my knowledge, there is no direct reference to the biblical Hebrew kings anywhere in archeology. There are a lot of assumptions, like the one here by referring to 1000 BCE as the Solamonian age. That's been said so many times, that it almost became a fact. The truth is, none of the biblical pre Babylonian exile events have been confirmed with archeological evidence. That gave rise to the theory the Torah was written in Babylon. Hebrew priests wanted to prevent the Israelites from being absorbed into the Babylonian society never to be heard of again. So, they assembled a book about the history of the tribes that supposedly made up the Hebrew kingdom. By giving the Israelites a fantastic past, the priests wanted to motivate the captured tribes to return to the relative wilderness of the Levant, and reclaim their lands. At the root of this alleged history is Abraham, a mythical Mesopotamian who emigrated to the Levant possibly 2 millennia earlier. After all, Genesis is basically a version of Sumer fables that were recorded over 5000 years ago, well before the alleged creation of a Hebrew kingdom. There is no evidence such a kingdom ever existed, at least not in the manner described in biblical texts. The tribal people living in that Levant region were polytheistic nomadic shepherds, who didn't build cities of stone and no rich temples. The cities referred to in the scriptures, like Jericho and Jerusalem, predate biblical events. They most certainly couldn't have been built by the tribal Israelites. For example, Jericho was destroyed and rebuilt several times throughout history. The origin of each destruction is hard to decipher, if not impossible. There's no way to single out a destructive event and link it to the biblical destruction of Jericho. Therefore, if someone wanted to claim the destruction of Jericho as the handiwork of their people, who can argue against it? The same is true with trade links of ancient tribes. We now know that trade relationships linked up tribes in a much wider area than previously assumed. Even BCE Celts were found to possess middle eastern jewelry. Far reaching trade routes were established surprisingly early in history. That makes links between Levant and Sheeba tribes interesting, but not particularly special. What would be special is if among the 1000s of Egyptian hieroglyphs found in Egypt, a single indisputable reference to the biblical Exodus was identified. We have none to date.