153,000-year-old footprints from South Africa are the oldest Homo sapiens tracks on record

[admin]

A modern dating method has revealed the oldest Homo sapiens' footprints yet, placing bipedal humans in South Africa around 153,000 years ago.

153,000-year-old footprints from South Africa are the oldest Homo sapiens tracks on record : Read more

 

[Giovani]

A modern dating method has revealed the oldest Homo sapiens' footprints yet, placing bipedal humans in South Africa around 153,000 years ago.

153,000-year-old footprints from South Africa are the oldest Homo sapiens tracks on record : Read more

 

[Giovani]

I say if archeologists report discovering 153,000-year-old human footprints we should accept it.
There are universities and internet chock full of human evolution which remains to be proven to this day. I'll be looking for front page news in every publication which exists in this world, for the final confirmation of human evolution.
With the obvious confronting us on library shelves, if it hasn't been decidedly proven that humankind evolved as apes did, then it must be a spectacular lie which has been perpetrated for a century.
Puzzling. It's as if the scientific community is obsessed with proving human evolution even though they still haven't.

 

[Sparky]

We still have a lot of missing history to find. Humans have been found to date back to around 5 million years ago. So while this is a great find we are still missing a great deal fossilized history. We have found some structures alone have dated back well over 300,000 years ago, and some far older. But science finds it difficult to accept those findings, it would mean they are not entirely accurate with there own findings. There is still a lot of digging to do if we ever want to get more details in our history. Not like there were billions of people way back then so it is not going to be easy to find their remains. Our landmass has gone through a lot of major transformational changes with plate tectonics since it began. And if hominids stayed along the coastlines all their remains would have been buried deep under the water. Scan are not going to find something buried hundreds or thousands of feel below the oceans floors.

 

[bolide2]

There will not be "front page news in every publication which exists in this world, for the final confirmation of human evolution." This is mostly because evolution is already generally accepted in the scientific community, and among educated people in general. Likewise, evolution, like scientific theories in general, is not subject to some kind of "final" proof, as if it were a theorem in geometry. It is rather confirmed by the vast weight of evidence that it is the best explanation we have for the development of living creatures on this planet.

 

[Giovani]

There will not be "front page news in every publication which exists in this world, for the final confirmation of human evolution." This is mostly because evolution is already generally accepted in the scientific community, and among educated people in general. Likewise, evolution, like scientific theories in general, is not subject to some kind of "final" proof, as if it were a theorem in geometry. It is rather confirmed by the vast weight of evidence that it is the best explanation we have for the development of living creatures on this planet.

So the proof of human evolution has been allowed to slide by all this time because scientists have rationally accepted something they really haven't confirmed to the world's satisfaction.
If I pressed hard, my point would be obvious. The problem is in individuals not informed enough to comment or debate. Exactly where do humans appear? Certainly not 153,000 years ago. The authors should be embarrassed at the evidence which proves nothing of the sort, in fact it looks desperate.
Scientific evidence is indeed lacking as to where we came from. The professional stretches of facts in an enduring hope to "lay to rest" the conjecture of origins concerning humankind, are doggedly admired but futile.